tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19804145157447636052024-03-13T13:28:32.213-04:00ArcAhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.comBlogger98125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-30400130471876611522010-01-18T07:00:00.005-05:002010-01-18T07:00:08.058-05:00Full-body scanners used on air passengers may damage human DNA<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><div><br /></div>by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews</a>) <b>In researching the biological effects of the </b><i><b>millimeter wave scanners</b></i><b> used for whole body imaging at airports, NaturalNews has learned that the energy emitted by the machines may damage human DNA.<br /><br />Millimeter wave machines represent one of two primary technologies currently being used for the "digital strip searches" being conducted at airports around the world. "The Transportation Security Administration utilizes two technologies to capture naked images of air travelers - backscatter x-ray technology and millimeter wave technology," reports the </b><i><b>Electronic Privacy Information Center</b></i><b>, a non-profit currently suing the U.S. government to stop these electronic strip searches. (</b><a href="http://epic.org/privacy/airtravel/backscatter/" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>http://epic.org/privacy/airtravel/b...</b></a><b>)<br /><br />In order to generate the nude image of the human body, these machines emit terahertz photons -- high-frequency energy "particles" that can pass through clothing and body tissue.<br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">The manufacturers of such machines claim they are perfectly safe and present no </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">health</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> risks, but a study conducted by Boian S. Alexandrov (and colleagues) at the </span></b><i><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico</span></b></i><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> showed that these terahertz waves could "...unzip double-stranded </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/DNA.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">DNA</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/gene_expression.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">gene expression</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> and DNA replication."<br /><br />In layman's terms, any time you're talking about interfering with "gene expression" and "DNA replication," you're essentially talking about something that could be a </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/risk.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">risk</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> to human health.</span></b></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"></span></b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: 50px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Never approved as safe for humans</span></span><br /><b>"At first glance, it's easy to dismiss any notion that they can be damaging," reports TechnologyReview.com (</b><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24331/" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>http://www.technologyreview.com/blo...</b></a><b>). "But a new generation of cameras are set to appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And if our exposure is set to increase, the question that urgently needs answering is what level of terahertz exposure is safe."<br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">And yet no such long-term safety testing has ever been conducted by a third party. There have been no clinical trials indicating that multiple exposures to such terahertz waves, accumulated over a long period of time, are safe for humans. The FDA, in particular, has never granted its approval for any such devices even though these devices clearly qualify as "medical devices."<br /><br />(If you try to sell an X-ray imaging device yourself, without FDA approval, you'll be arrested. So why do these </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/TSA.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">TSA</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> suppliers get away with selling human body imaging equipment that has never been adequately safety tested or approved by </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/the_FDA.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">the FDA</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">?)</span><br /><br />The study cited in the TechnologyReview article mentioned above is visible at:</b><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294</b></a><b><br /><br />There, study authors conclude: "Based on our results we argue that a specific terahertz radiation exposure may significantly affect the natural dynamics of DNA, and thereby influence intricate molecular processes involved in gene expression and DNA replication."<br /><br />In other words, millimeter wave scanning devices may damage your DNA.</b><br /><br /><img src="http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/WaveScanners.jpg" /><br /><i>(These images depict what <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/the_TSA.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">the TSA</a> sees when air passengers are subjected to full-body scans using millimeter wave technology and / or backscatter <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/X-rays.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">X-rays</a>.)</i></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><i></i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: 50px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Could these scans cause </span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cancer.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">cancer</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> and birth defects?</span></span><br /><b>Could these scans cause </b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/infertility.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>infertility</b></a><b>? Cancer? Shortened lifespan? We don't yet know the answers to these questions, but then again </b><i><b>neither does the TSA</b></i><b>. This technology is being recklessly rolled out without adequate safety testing that would prove it safe for long-term use.<br /><br />How many times in the past have the "experts" told us technologies were perfectly safe and then later we found out they were dangerous? X-Rays were once used in shoe stores to see if new shoes would fit the bone structure of your feet. High-voltage power lines are perfectly safe, we're told -- but then why do children who live closer to those lines have higher rates of cancer?<br /><br />Dentists </b><i><b>still</b></i><b> claim that mercury fillings are perfectly safe for your health -- a preposterous notion -- and </b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cell_phone.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>cell phone</b></a><b> companies continue to insist that cell phone radiation isn't hazardous to your health at all. Time and time again, the public has been lied to by the authorities during the roll-out of some new technology. Why should we believe that full-body scanners are safe when they've never been proven safe? Furthermore, there is now reason to believe they may damage human DNA.<br /><br />What if the experts are wrong about their safety and ten years later we find out that there is cumulative DNA damage that causes infertility and cancer? What if air </b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/travelers.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>travelers</b></a><b> who subject themselves to this radiation wind up suffering some currently-unknown health condition as a result? At no time in the history of human civilization have large numbers of humans ever been subjected to terahertz bombardment of this type and frequency.<br /><br />Sure, you can argue that you get more radiation sitting in an airplane at high altitude than you get from a full-body scanner, or you can explain that cell phones emit far more radiation on the whole (which they do, when you're talking on them anyway). But if there's one thing we all should have learned about radiation by now it's that frequencies matter. The terahertz frequencies have never been rolled out </b><i><b>en masse</b></i><b> in a scanning technology. Who's to say they're going to be safe?<br /><br />What about pregnant </b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/women.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>women</b></a><b>? Can the TSA absolutely guarantee that these full-body scanners won't damage the DNA of the unborn babies? What if this technology becomes </b><i><b>the next Thalidomide</b></i><b> and ten months from now women start giving birth to mutant babies who were damaged by terahertz radiation?<br /><br />I'm not saying this is going to happen, but wouldn't it be wise to determine the safety of this technology </b><i><b>in advance of its global rollout?</b></i><b><br /><br />As the </b><i><b>National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements</b></i><b> admitted in a 2002 report that studied these security devices: (</b><a href="http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/03/briefing/3987b1_pres-report.pdf" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC...</b></a><b>)<br /><br /></b><i><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">"[We] cannot exclude the possibility of a fatal cancer attributable to radiation in a very large population of people exposed to very low doses of radiation."</span></b></i><b><br /><br />Barring solid evidence of the safety of this terahertz-emitting technology, the TSA would be wise to follow </b><i><b>the Precautionary Principle</b></i><b> which states that we should err on the side of caution when it comes to the roll out of new technologies. Unfortunately, the TSA appears to be erring on the side of stupidity by subjecting the public to an unproven, "experimental" technology with unknown long-term effects on human DNA.<br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">And here's the real kicker: These full-body scanners do nothing to stop </span></span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/terrorists.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">terrorists</span></span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> because they can't detect powder explosives in the first place. A determined terrorist can hide all sorts of powder in a shoe, or a sleeping pillow, or a plastic bag sewn into the side of his carry-on luggage. There are a thousand places for terrorists to hide explosives that won't be caught on full-body scanners, no matter how detailed the images are.</span></span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">Besides, in order to avoid engaging in child pornography (because these machines offer very detailed depictions of body parts), the rules will allow people under 18 years of age to bypass them. So all you need then, if you're a terrorist, is a 17-year-old terrorist assistant who can pack explosives in his own underwear.</span></span></b></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"></span></b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: 50px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Radiology experts claim full-body scanners are <i>safe</i></span></span><br /><b>Radiology experts are claiming that the radiation emitted from these full-body scanners is perfectly safe for you. Then again, they also claim </b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/mammograms.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>mammograms</b></a><b> are safe, and recent science has now proven that mammograms cause cancer.<br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">When it comes to radiation safety, </span></b><i><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">you can't trust radiologists</span></b></i><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">. They say all that radiation is safe for YOU, but then they flee the room when the X-rays are turned on, ever notice that? They really have zero credibility when talking about the long-term safety of medical imaging devices. Most doctors, similarly, don't have any real clue how much radiation is emitted by a CT scan!</span><br /><br />As BusinessWeek reports: (</b><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/634724.html" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><b>http://www.businessweek.com/lifesty...</b></a><b>)<br /><br /></b><i><b>"The health effects of the more common millimeter-wave scanners are largely unknown, and at least one expert believes a safety study is warranted.<br /><br />'I am very interested in performing a National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements study on the use of millimeter-wave security screening systems,' said Thomas S. Tenforde, council president."</b></i><b><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">The </span></b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/New_York.html" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">New York</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"> Times adds: (</span></b><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/health/09scanner.html" target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/h...</span></b></a><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">)<br /><br /></span></b><i><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">"Collectively, the radiation doses from the scanners incrementally increase the risk of fatal cancers among the thousands or millions of travelers who will be exposed, some radiation experts believe."</span></b></i><b><br /><br />NYT goes on to state that the TSA has entered into a contract under which it could purchase 900 full-body scanners to be deployed in airport all across the country.</b></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 50px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Resources:</span></span><br /><i>Physics Letters</i>, January 8, 2010<br /><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294</a><br /><br />Technology Review:<br /><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24331/" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">http://www.technologyreview.com/blo...</a><br /><br />Wikipedia:<br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millimeter_wave_scanner#cite_note-5" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millim...</a><br /><br />New York Times:<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/health/09scanner.html" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/h...</a></span></div></div></div></div>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-80107828922063416172010-01-16T01:00:00.001-05:002010-01-16T01:23:00.595-05:00Anti-Terrorism Officials Are Regulating Us, Not Terrorists<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; color: rgb(0, 51, 51); line-height: 28px; "><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><br /></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0); font-size: 18px; line-height: 26px; font-weight: 800; ">By Jim Hightower</span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(204, 102, 0); font-size: 18px; line-height: 26px; font-weight: 800; ">Creators, January 6, 2010</span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><br /></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>You didn't get a virgin when you drew me as one of your political commentators, for I've been through the fires of Texas politics, including having been elected state agriculture commissioner. Among other duties, this office made me the regulator of such matters as pesticide use, the accuracy of gas pump gauges and even the sizing of eggs.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>I can tell you from experience that wielding regulatory authority is both a blessing and a curse for political officials. You can do some real good for the public, but your best efforts can also make fast enemies of the regulatees.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>So my general instruction to the staff was that we should not regulate just for the hell of it, just because we could. Rather, any rules we imposed should respond to a real need and should actually work - work in the sense that they would deliver the protection the public needs.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">We had a little internal slogan to guide us: "When in doubt, try common sense."</span></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"><br /></span></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">I'd like to loan this slogan to the national authorities in charge of protecting us from terrorist attacks, for they seem determined to restrict the American people rather than actually to stop terrorists. In response to the deranged Nigerian who tried to blow up a passenger jet with his underwear on Christmas Day, they've done a collective regulatory knee-jerk that is kicking us ever deeper into the wilds of security silliness.</span></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>This was not their first knee-jerk. Thanks to the fizzled shoe bomb incident aboard a 2001 flight, they still require all of us who fly in our Land of the Free to bow to the gods of global terrorism before entering the terminal by removing our booties and putting our tiny tubes of toothpaste in little zippy bags. This ridiculous ritual, we're told, will fend off another shoe bomber.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>But terrorists seem to be somewhat adaptive (gosh, who could've imagined it?), so the latest attack comes not from shoes, but from an al-Qaida guy's shorts.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>The only way to stop this, cry the knee-jerkers, is to have authorities peek under every passenger's skivvies.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b>To allow airport screeners to do just that, corporate profiteers are peddling super-sophisticated x-ray machines with "superman eyes." You will have to stand in the scanner, and spread your legs and raise your arms in the arrest position to give your friendly screener a front-and-back, full-body look right through your clothes. Supposedly, faces will be blurred out, but body contours of every man, woman and child who flies will be on the screen - and some images almost certainly will pop up on Internet postings. "So what?" bark the authorities. Freedom comes at a price, and this new rule is all about us protecting you.</b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">Really? Let's note that one of the big backers of the full-body technology is former homeland security honcho Michael Chertoff. In dozens of interviews he gave after the Christmas incident, Chertoff demanded nationwide deployment of these machines to stop more underwear attacks by terrorists. Now, guess whose Washington consulting firm represents Rapiscan Systems, one of the major contractors selling the machines to the government. Right. Chertoff's firm.</span></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;"><br /></span></b></span></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#FF0000;">Rather than searching every one of us, officials need to be searching for actual terrorists, using old-fashioned intelligence-gathering and common-sense coordination to stop assailants before they even get to an airport. The Christmas Day bomber should never have gotten near that plane, for he was known by U.S. officials to be a terrorist threat. </span></b></span><br /></div><div class="story" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0.25em; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0.25em; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.4em; "><br /><a href="http://www.creators.com/opinion/jim-hightower/anti-terrorism-officials-are-regulating-us-not-terrorists.html" target="_blank" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); ">>>> Read the Full Article </a></p></div></span>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-41335832765046761672010-01-14T07:00:00.001-05:002010-01-16T01:07:14.772-05:00Three Approved GMO Crops Linked to Organ Damage, New Study Shows<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><div><br /></div><div>by Aaron Turpen, citizen journalist</div><div><br /></div>(<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews</a>) <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>Genetically Modified crops (or GM) are genetically modified organisms (GMO) that have been altered to meet a specific profile. They have also been the subject of controversy almost since their introduction two decades ago. A new study pinpoints three variations of GM corn (maize) as being linked to organ damage in mammals.<br /><br />The three varieties in question are Mon 810, Mon 863, and NK 603. The "Mon" is for, you guessed it, Monsanto and the NK is also a Monsanto product, being engineered for herbicide tolerance. The study was conducted by the Committee of Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) and the Universities of Caen and Rouen in France.</b></span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>1</b></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b><br /><br />The study used the same data that was used by </b></span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Monsanto.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>Monsanto</b></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b> to gain approval in several parts of the world. The data was released publicly in 2005 by European authorities when the three GM strains were approved for human consumption in both the U.S. and Europe.<br /><br />Gilles-Eric Seralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen and one of the principals in the study, says that the data "clearly underlines adverse impacts on kidneys and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, as well as different levels of damages to heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system."<br /><br />Each of the three strains produced differing amounts of adverse impact, but the impact on vital organs was universal for all three </b></span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/GM_crops.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>GM crops</b></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>.<br /><br />The study was completed in December 2009 and appears in the </b></span><em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>International Journal of Biological Sciences</b></span></em><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>1</b></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b> (IJBS). It conforms with and substantiates an earlier study done by CRIIGEN in 2007 on Mon 863.</b></span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>2</b></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b> The results of that study were rejected by Monsanto.</b></span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>3</b></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b><br /><br />One controversy many point to when criticizing Monsanto's counter-analysis as well as the governmental acceptance of the GM </b></span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/crops.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>crops</b></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b> is in the way Monsanto's studies were carried out. Traditionally, when testing drug, pesticide, or other human-ingested items' safety, the standard protocol is to use three different mammalian species.<br /><br />Monsanto used only rats for their studies, but still managed to win </b></span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/GMO.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>GMO</b></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b> approval in at least a dozen countries. Further, the studies were carried out in only 90 day spans, which is not long enough to find most chronic problems.<br /><br />Other problems with Monsanto's studies should have raised more red flags, but they were ignored by the governmental panels put in charge of making the decision to allow the company's </b></span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/genetically_modified_crops.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>genetically modified crops</b></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b> into wide distribution in their countries.<br /><br />The new CRIIGEN study concludes that the raw data makes it clear that all three GMO crops have real problems and should be put under "an immediate ban on the import and export of these </b></span><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/GMOs.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>GMOs</b></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>." The study also strongly recommends additional long-term, multi-generational animal feeding studies be done on at least three species to provide truly scientific "data on the acute and chronic toxic effects of GM crops, feed and foods."</b></span><br /><br /></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><br />Resources:</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: small; "><br />1 - de Vendomois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, Seralini GE. <a href="http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; "><em>A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health.</em></a> - Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726.<br /><br />2 - <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/gp_briefing_seralini_study.pdf" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">Greenpeace analysis of MON863 CRIIGEN study, 2007</a>.<br /><br />3 - Rejection of the 2007 study <a href="http://www.monsanto.com/products/techandsafety/safetysummaries/focus863.asp" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">on Monsanto's website</a>.<br /><br />4 - <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/GoogleSearchResults.html?q=gmo&cx=010579349100583850635:w_kzwe9_yca&cof=FORID:11&ie=UTF-8&sa.x=0&sa.y=0&sa=Search&siteurl=naturalnews.com/" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); text-decoration: none; ">Information about Genetically Modified foods and GMOs here on NaturalNews</a>.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></div>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-14992362409785451962009-09-02T12:00:00.003-04:002009-09-02T12:00:02.386-04:00Stop the Shot: "Swine Flu" Vaccine: Untested, Uninsurable, Unproven<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ASibLqwVbsk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ASibLqwVbsk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cCAIW5OgdN0&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cCAIW5OgdN0&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZINew8Elmgk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZINew8Elmgk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><embed src='http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/player-dest.swf' FlashVars='linkUrl=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5237185n&releaseURL=http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/player-dest.swf&videoId=50075579&partner=news&vert=News&autoPlayVid=false&name=cbsPlayer&allowScriptAccess=always&wmode=transparent&embedded=y&scale=noscale&rv=n&salign=tl' allowFullScreen='true' width='425' height='324' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed><br/><a href='http://www.cbs.com'>Watch CBS Videos Online</a><br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/B4SmFxyust0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B4SmFxyust0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/z026934_health_public_health_quarantine.html"><span style="font-weight:bold;">Click here for more info on possible mandatory vaccinations</span></a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-49238281066749410262009-09-02T07:00:00.001-04:002009-09-02T07:00:05.156-04:00Warning: Swine Flu Shot Linked to Killer Nerve Disease<span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" >A warning that the swine flu vaccine has been linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the UK Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter. </span><p style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size:130%;">The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, was leaked to <em>The Daily Mail</em>, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.</span></p> <p style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size:130%;">It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the vaccine. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal.</span></p> <p style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size:130%;">The letter refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the United States in 1976 when:</span></p> <ul style="list-style-type: disc; margin-top: 0in; font-weight: bold;"><li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size:130%;">More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu </span></li><li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size:130%;">The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times </span></li><li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size:130%;">The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS became clear </span></li><li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size:130%;">The U.S. Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to those affected </span></li></ul> <p style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size:130%;">Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not been sufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, are unknown.</span></p> <span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" ><br /><span class="RatedArticles">Sources:</span><br /><img src="http://articles.mercola.com/Themes/mercolaArticle/images/bullet.gif" border="0" /> <span id="ctl00_ctl00_ctl00_bcr_bcr_bcr_rptSources_ctl01_cslSource"><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease-Leaked-letter-reveals-concern-neurologists-25-deaths-America.html">The Daily Mail August 15, 2009</a></span></span>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-41309026107475276132009-09-02T05:00:00.001-04:002009-09-02T05:00:00.426-04:00Historical facts about the dangers (and failures) of vaccines<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;"><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor<br /><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Vaccines are the quackery of modern medicine. Mass vaccination programs not only fail to protect the population from infectious disease, they actually </span><i style="font-weight: bold;">accelerate</i><span style="font-weight: bold;"> the spread of disease in many cases.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />Many websites have cropped up over the last few years to counter the pro-vaccine propaganda put out by drug companies (who profit from vaccines) and health regulators (who serve the drug companies). One of those sites is </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/" target="_blank">www.VaccinationDebate.com</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> , which lists the following historical facts about </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/vaccines.html">vaccines</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">:</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/polio.html">polio</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/outbreak.html">outbreak</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/vaccination.html">vaccination</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (</span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020119hadwin/020119hadwin.toc.html" target="_blank">http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/020...</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">)</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Hadwen Documents</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">.<br /><br />• In </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Germany.html">Germany</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don't Get Stuck, Hannah Allen)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1967, Ghana was declared </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/measles.html">measles</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/polio_vaccine.html">polio vaccine</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 "Abstracts" )</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. (Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In the 1970's a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. (The Lancet 12/1/80 p73)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. (The People's Doctor, Dr R Mendelsohn)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• The February 1981 issue of the </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Journal_of_the_American_Medical_Association.html">Journal of the American Medical Association</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> found that 90% of obstetricians and 66% of pediatricians refused to take the rubella vaccine.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times! (BMJ 283:696-697, 1981)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In the USA, the cost of a single DPT shot had risen from 11 cents in 1982 to $11.40 in 1987. The manufacturers of the vaccine were putting aside $8 per shot to cover legal costs and damages they were paying out to parents of brain damaged children and children who died after vaccination. (The Vine, Issue 7, January 1994, Nambour, Qld)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In Oman between 1988 and 1989, a polio outbreak occurred amongst thousands of fully vaccinated children. The region with the highest attack rate had the highest vaccine coverage. The region with the lowest attack rate had the lowest vaccine coverage. (The Lancet, 21/9/91)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1990, a UK survey involving 598 doctors revealed that over 50% of them refused to have the Hepatitis B vaccine despite belonging to the high risk group urged to be vaccinated. (British Med Jnl, 27/1/1990)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In the USA, from July 1990 to November 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration counted a total of 54,072 adverse reactions following vaccination. The FDA admitted that this number represented only 10% of the real total, because most doctors were refusing to report vaccine injuries. In other words, adverse reactions for this period exceeded half a million! (National Vaccine Information Centre, March 2, 1994)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In 1990, the Journal of the </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/American_Medical_Association.html">American Medical Association</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> had an article on measles which stated " Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the US are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children." (JAMA, 21/11/90)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• In the New England Journal of Medicine July 1994 issue a study found that over 80% of children under 5 years of age who had contracted whooping cough had been fully vaccinated.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br />• On November 2nd, 2000, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced that its members voted at their 57th annual meeting in St Louis to pass a resolution calling for an end to mandatory childhood vaccines. The resolution passed without a single "no" vote. </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.wellnesschiro.com/physicians_group_end_mandatory_vaccines.htm" target="_blank">http://www.wellnesschiro.com/physic...</a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">(Report by Michael Devitt)</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Source: </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/web2.html" target="_blank">http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/we...</a></span></span><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:130%;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /><br /><br /></span></span><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Read more at NaturalPedia:</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: bold;font-family:verdana;font-size:130%;" ><br /><br />You can also learn a wealth of information about the dangers of vaccines at NaturalPedia.com. Try these pages for more:<br /><br />Vaccines: <a href="http://naturalpedia.com/vaccines.html" target="_blank">http://naturalpedia.com/vaccines.html</a><br /><br />Vaccinations: <a href="http://naturalpedia.com/vaccinations.html" target="_blank">http://naturalpedia.com/vaccination...</a><br /><br />Gardasil: <a href="http://naturalpedia.com/gardasil.html" target="_blank">http://naturalpedia.com/gardasil.html</a><br /><br />HPV: <a href="http://naturalpedia.com/HPV.html" target="_blank">http://naturalpedia.com/HPV.html</a><br /><br />The more you learn about vaccines, the more bizarre the pro-vaccine camp begins to look. And if you dig really deep, it becomes apparent their vaccines are based on nothing more than wishful thinking and circular logic (we support vaccines because we support vaccines, etc.).<br /><br />So what's better than vaccines? <i>Health education</i>. A healthy population with high levels of vitamin D and other essential nutrients needs no vaccines. Maybe that's why they're never told about these things: Big Pharma's vaccine business depends on people remaining nutritionally ignorant. See <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/026843_health_food_nutrition.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/026843_h...</a> for more details.</span>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-18349841774539690572009-06-29T21:00:00.002-04:002009-06-29T21:00:12.822-04:00Actor Jim Carrey: The Judgment on Vaccines Is In?by Jim Carrey<br /><br /><strong>Recently, I was amazed to hear a commentary by CNN’s Campbell Brown on the controversial vaccine issue. After a ruling by the ’special vaccine court’ saying the Measles, Mumps, Rubella shot wasn’t found to be responsible for the plaintiffs’ autism, she and others in the media began making assertions that the judgment was in, and vaccines had been proven safe. No one would be more relieved than Jenny and I if that were true.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But with all due respect to Ms. Brown, a ruling against causation in three cases out of more than 5000 hardly proves that other children won’t be adversely affected by the MMR, let alone that all vaccines are safe. This is a huge leap of logic by anyone’s standards. Not everyone gets cancer from smoking, but cigarettes do cause cancer. After 100 years and many rulings in favor of the tobacco companies, we finally figured that out.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The truth is that no one without a vested interest in the profitability of vaccines has studied all 36 of them in depth. There are more than 100 vaccines in development, and no tests for cumulative effect or vaccine interaction of all 36 vaccines in the current schedule have ever been done. If I’m mistaken, I challenge those who are making such grand pronouncements about vaccine safety to produce those studies.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>If we are to believe that the ruling of the ‘vaccine court’ in these cases mean that all vaccines are safe, then we must also consider the rulings of that same court in the Hannah Polling and Bailey Banks cases, which ruled vaccines were the cause of autism and therefore assume that all vaccines are unsafe. Clearly both are irresponsible assumptions, and neither option is prudent.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In this growing crisis, we cannot afford to blindly trumpet the agenda of the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) or vaccine makers. Now more than ever, we must resist the urge to close this book before it’s been written. The anecdotal evidence of millions of parents who’ve seen their totally normal kids regress into sickness and mental isolation after a trip to the pediatrician’s office must be seriously considered. The legitimate concern they and many in the scientific community have that environmental toxins, including those found in vaccines, may be causing autism and other disorders (Aspergers, ADD, ADHD), cannot be dissuaded by a show of sympathy and a friendly invitation to look for the ‘real’ cause of autism anywhere but within the lucrative vaccine program.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>With vaccines being the fastest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry, isn’t it possible that profits may play a part in the decision-making? That the vaccine program is becoming more of a profit engine than a means of prevention? In a world left reeling from the catastrophic effects of greed, mismanagement and corporate insensitivity, is it so absurd for us to wonder why American children are being given twice as many vaccines on average, compared to the top 30 first world countries?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Paul Offit, the vaccine advocate and profiteer, who helped invent a Rotavirus vaccine is said to have paved the way for his own multi-million dollar windfall while serving on the very council that eventually voted his Rotavirus vaccine onto our children’s schedule. On August 21, 2000 a congressional investigation’s report titled, “Conflicts in Vaccine Policy,” stated:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><em><strong>It has become clear over the course of this investigation that the VRBPAC and the ACIP [the two main advisory boards that determine the vaccine schedule] are dominated by individuals with close working relationships with the vaccine producers. This was never the intent of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires that a diversity of views be represented on advisory committees.</strong></em><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Isn’t that enough to raise questions about the process of choosing the vaccine schedule?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>With many states like Minnesota now reporting the number at 1 in 80 children affected with autism, can we afford to trust those who serve two masters or their logic that tells us “one size fits all” when it comes to vaccines? Can we afford to ignore vaccines as a possible cause of these rising numbers when they are one of the fastest growing elements in our children’s environment? With all the doubt that’s left hanging on this topic, how can anyone in the media or medical profession, boldly demand that all parents march out and give their kids 36 of these shots, six at a time in dosage levels equal to that given to a 200 pound man? This is a bias of the most dangerous kind.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I’ve also heard it said that no evidence of a link between vaccines and autism has ever been found. That statement is only true for the CDC, the AAP and the vaccine makers who’ve been ignoring mountains of scientific information and testimony. There’s no evidence of the Lincoln Memorial if you look the other way and refuse to turn around. But if you care to look, it’s really quite impressive. For a sample of vaccine injury evidence go to </strong><a href="http://www.generationrescue.org/lincolnmemorial.html"><strong>www.generationrescue.org/lincolnmemorial.html</strong></a><strong>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>We have never argued that people shouldn’t be immunized for the most serious threats including measles and polio, but surely there’s a limit as to how many viruses and toxins can be introduced into the body of a small child. Veterinarians found out years ago that in many cases they were over-immunizing our pets, a syndrome they call Vaccinosis. It overwhelmed the immune system of the animals, causing myriad physical and neurological disorders. Sound familiar? If you can over-immunize a dog, is it so far out to assume that you can over-immunize a child? These forward thinking vets also decided to remove thimerosal from animal vaccines in 1992, and yet this substance, which is 49% mercury, is still in human vaccines. Don’t our children deserve as much consideration as our pets?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I think I’d rather listen to the more sensible voice of Dr. Bernadine Healy, former head of the National Institute of Health, who says:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><em><strong>Listen to the patients and the patients will teach… I think there is an inexcusable issue, and that’s the lack of research that’s been done here… A parent can legitimately question giving a one-day old baby, or a two-day old baby [the] Hepatitis B vaccine that has no risk for it [and] the mother has no risk for it. That’s a heavy-duty vaccine given on day two [of life]. I think those are legitimate questions.</strong></em><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Dr. Healy is also calling for a long overdue study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. Dr. Frank Engly, a researcher and microbiologist who served on the boards of the CDC, FDA and EPA during the 70s and 80s, warned:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><em><strong>The CDC cannot afford to admit thimerosal is toxic because they have been promoting it for several years… If they would have followed through with our 1982 report, vaccines would have been freed of thimerosal and all this autism as they tell me would not have occurred. But as it is, it all occurred.</strong></em><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In all likelihood the truth about vaccines is that they are both good and bad. While ingredients like aluminum, mercury, ether, formaldehyde and anti-freeze may help preserve and enhance vaccines, they can be toxic as well. The assortment of viruses delivered by multiple immunizations may also be a hazard. I agree with the growing number of voices within the medical and scientific community who believe that vaccines, like every other drug, have risks as well as benefits and that for the sake of profit, American children are being given too many, too soon. One thing is certain. We don’t know enough to announce that all vaccines are safe!</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>If the CDC, the AAP and Ms. Brown insist that our children take twice as many shots as the rest of the western world, we need more independent vaccine research not done by the drug companies selling the vaccines or by organizations under their influence. Studies that cannot be internally suppressed. Answers parents can trust. Perhaps this is what Campbell Brown should be demanding and how the power of the press could better serve the public in the future.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>– Jim Carrey</strong>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-73886694755384757252009-06-13T07:00:00.005-04:002009-06-13T07:00:57.177-04:00DOCTORS WARN: AVOID GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD<a href="http://silverbulletin.utopiasilver.com/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1">Silver Bulletin e-News Magazine</a><br /><br />by Jeffrey M. Smith<br /><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong>On May 19th, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) called on “Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM (genetically modified) foods when possible and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks.”[1] They called for a moratorium on GM foods, long-term independent studies, and labeling. AAEM’s position paper stated, “Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food,” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. They conclude, “There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation,” as defined by recognized scientific criteria. “The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.”<br /><br />More and more doctors are already prescribing GM-free diets. Dr. Amy Dean, a Michigan internal medicine specialist, and board member of AAEM says, “I strongly recommend patients eat strictly non-genetically modified foods.” Ohio allergist Dr. John Boyles says “I used to test for soy allergies all the time, but now that soy is genetically engineered, it is so dangerous that I tell people never to eat it.”<br /><br />Dr. Jennifer Armstrong, President of AAEM, says, “Physicians are probably seeing the effects in their patients, but need to know how to ask the right questions.” World renowned biologist Pushpa M. Bhargava goes one step further. After reviewing more than 600 scientific journals, he concludes that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a major contributor to the sharply deteriorating health of Americans.<br /><br />Pregnant women and babies at great risk<br /><br />Among the population, biologist David Schubert of the Salk Institute warns that “children are the most likely to be adversely effected by toxins and other dietary problems” related to GM foods. He says without adequate studies, the children become “the experimental animals.”[2]<br /><br />The experience of actual GM-fed experimental animals is scary. When GM soy was fed to female rats, most of their babies died within three weeks—compared to a 10% death rate among the control group fed natural soy.[3] The GM-fed babies were also smaller, and later had problems getting pregnant.[4]<br /><br />When male rats were fed GM soy, their testicles actually changed color—from the normal pink to dark blue.[5] Mice fed GM soy had altered young sperm.[6] Even the embryos of GM fed parent mice had significant changes in their DNA.[7] Mice fed GM corn in an Austrian government study had fewer babies, which were also smaller than normal.[8]<br /><br />Reproductive problems also plague livestock. Investigations in the state of Haryana, India revealed that most buffalo that ate GM cottonseed had complications such as premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, and prolapsed uteruses. Many calves died. In the US, about two dozen farmers reported thousands of pigs became sterile after consuming certain GM corn varieties. Some had false pregnancies; others gave birth to bags of water. Cows and bulls also became infertile when fed the same corn.[9]<br /><br /><span style="color:#ff0000;">In the US population, the incidence of low birth weight babies, infertility, and infant mortality are all escalating.</span><br /><br />Food designed to produce toxin<br /><br />GM corn and cotton are engineered to produce their own built-in pesticide in every cell. When bugs bite the plant, the poison splits open their stomach and kills them. Biotech companies claim that the pesticide, called Bt—produced from soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis—has a history of safe use, since organic farmers and others use Bt bacteria spray for natural insect control. Genetic engineers insert Bt genes into corn and cotton, so the plants do the killing.<br /><br />The Bt-toxin produced in GM plants, however, is thousands of times more concentrated than natural Bt spray, it is designed to be more toxic,[10] has properties of an allergen, and unlike the spray, cannot be washed off the plant.<br /><br />Moreover, studies confirm that even the less toxic natural bacterial spray is harmful. When dispersed by plane to kill gypsy moths in the Pacific Northwest, about 500 people reported allergy or flu-like symptoms. Some had to go to the emergency room.[11],[12]<br /><br />The exact same symptoms are now being reported by farm workers throughout India, from handling Bt cotton.[13] In 2008, based on medical records, the Sunday India reported, “Victims of itching have increased massively this year . . . related to BT cotton farming.”[14]<br /><br />GMOs provoke immune reactions<br /><br />AAEM states, “Multiple animal studies show significant immune dysregulation,” including increase in cytokines, which are “associated with asthma, allergy, and inflammation”—all on the rise in the US.<br /><br />According to GM food safety expert Dr. Arpad Pusztai, changes in the immune status of GM animals are “a consistent feature of all the studies.”[15] Even Monsanto’s own research showed significant immune system changes in rats fed Bt corn.[16] A November 2008 by the Italian government also found that mice have an immune reaction to Bt corn.[17]<br /><br />GM soy and corn each contain two new proteins with allergenic properties,[18] GM soy has up to seven times more trypsin inhibitor—a known soy allergen,[19] and skin prick tests show some people react to GM, but not to non-GM soy.[20] Soon after GM soy was introduced to the UK, soy allergies skyrocketed by 50%. Perhaps the US epidemic of food allergies and asthma is a casualty of genetic manipulation.<br /><br />Animals dying in large numbers<br /><br />In India, animals graze on cotton plants after harvest. But when shepherds let sheep graze on Bt cotton plants, thousands died. Post mortems showed severe irritation and black patches in both intestines and liver (as well as enlarged bile ducts). Investigators said preliminary evidence “strongly suggests that the sheep mortality was due to a toxin. . . . most probably Bt-toxin.”[21] In a small follow-up feeding study by the Deccan Development Society, all sheep fed Bt cotton plants died within 30 days; those that grazed on natural cotton plants remained healthy.<br /><br />In a small village in Andhra Pradesh, buffalo grazed on cotton plants for eight years without incident. On January 3rd, 2008, the buffalo grazed on Bt cotton plants for the first time. All 13 were sick the next day; all died within 3 days.[22]<br /><br />Bt corn was also implicated in the deaths of cows in Germany, and horses, water buffaloes, and chickens in The Philippines.[23]<br /><br />In lab studies, twice the number of chickens fed Liberty Link corn died; 7 of 20 rats fed a GM tomato developed bleeding stomachs; another 7 of 40 died within two weeks.[24] Monsanto’s own study showed evidence of poisoning in major organs of rats fed Bt corn, according to top French toxicologist G. E. Seralini.[25]<br /><br />Worst finding of all—GMOs remain inside of us<br /><br />The only published human feeding study revealed what may be the most dangerous problem from GM foods. The gene inserted into GM soy transfers into the DNA of bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function.[26] This means that long after we stop eating GMOs, we may still have potentially harmful GM proteins produced continuously inside of us. Put more plainly, eating a corn chip produced from Bt corn might transform our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories, possibly for the rest of our lives.<br /><br />When evidence of gene transfer is reported at medical conferences around the US, doctors often respond by citing the huge increase of gastrointestinal problems among their patients over the last decade. GM foods might be colonizing the gut flora of North Americans.<br /><br />Warnings by government scientists ignored and denied<br /><br /><span style="color:#ff0000;">Scientists at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had warned about all these problems even in the early 1990s. According to documents released from a lawsuit, the scientific consensus at the agency was that GM foods were inherently dangerous, and might create hard-to-detect allergies, poisons, gene transfer to gut bacteria, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged their superiors to require rigorous long-term tests.[27] But the White House had ordered the agency to promote biotechnology and the FDA responded by recruiting Michael Taylor, Monsanto’s former attorney, to head up the formation of GMO policy. That policy, which is in effect today, denies knowledge of scientists’ concerns and declares that no safety studies on GMOs are required. It is up to Monsanto and the other biotech companies to determine if their foods are safe. Mr. Taylor later became Monsanto’s vice president.<br /></span><br />Dangerously few studies, untraceable diseases<br /><br />AAEM states, “GM foods have not been properly tested” and “pose a serious health risk.” Not a single human clinical trial on GMOs has been published. A 2007 review of published scientific literature on the “potential toxic effects/health risks of GM plants” revealed “that experimental data are very scarce.” The author concludes his review by asking, “Where is the scientific evidence showing that GM plants/food are toxicologically safe, as assumed by the biotechnology companies?”[28]<br /><br /><span style="color:#ff0000;">Famed Canadian geneticist David Suzuki answers, “The experiments simply haven’t been done and we now have become the guinea pigs.” He adds, “Anyone that says, ‘Oh, we know that this is perfectly safe,’ I say is either unbelievably stupid or deliberately lying.”[29]</span><br /><br />Dr. Schubert points out, “If there are problems, we will probably never know because the cause will not be traceable and many diseases take a very long time to develop.” If GMOs happen to cause immediate and acute symptoms with a unique signature, perhaps then we might have a chance to trace the cause.<br /><br />This is precisely what happened during a US epidemic in the late 1980s. The disease was fast acting, deadly, and caused a unique measurable change in the blood—but it still took more than four years to identify that an epidemic was even occurring. By then it had killed about 100 Americans and caused 5,000-10,000 people to fall sick or become permanently disabled. It was caused by a genetically engineered brand of a food supplement called L-tryptophan.<br /><br /><span style="color:#ff0000;">If other GM foods are contributing to the rise of autism, obesity, diabetes, asthma, cancer, heart disease, allergies, reproductive problems, or any other common health problem now plaguing Americans, we may never know. In fact, since animals fed GMOs had such a wide variety of problems, susceptible people may react to GM food with multiple symptoms. It is therefore telling that in the first nine years after the large scale introduction of GM crops in 1996, the incidence of people with three or more chronic diseases nearly doubled, from 7% to 13%.[30]<br /></span><br />To help identify if GMOs are causing harm, the AAEM asks their “members, the medical community, and the independent scientific community to gather case studies potentially related to GM food consumption and health effects, begin epidemiological research to investigate the role of GM foods on human health, and conduct safe methods of determining the effect of GM foods on human health.”<br /><br />Citizens need not wait for the results before taking the doctors advice to avoid GM foods. People can stay away from anything with soy or corn derivatives, cottonseed and canola oil, and sugar from GM sugar beets—unless it says organic or “non-GMO.” There is a pocket Non-GMO Shopping Guide, co-produced by the Institute for Responsible Technology and the Center for Food Safety, which is available as a download, as well as in natural food stores and in many doctors’ offices.<br /><br />If even a small percentage of people choose non-GMO brands, the food industry will likely respond as they did in Europe—by removing all GM ingredients. Thus, AAEM’s non-GMO prescription may be a watershed for the US food supply.<br /><br />International bestselling author and independent filmmaker Jeffrey M. Smith is the Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology and the leading spokesperson on the health dangers of GMOs. His first book, Seeds of Deception is the world’s bestselling book on the subject. His second, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, identifies 65 risks of GMOs and demonstrates how superficial government approvals are not competent to find most of them. He invited the biotech industry to respond in writing with evidence to counter each risk, but correctly predicted that they would refuse, since they don’t have the data to show that their products are safe.www.ResponsibleTechnology.org,<br /></strong></span><a href="mailto:info@responsibletechnology.org"><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong>info@responsibletechnology.org</strong></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong><br /></strong></span><br /><br /><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mNBmnMkSMCM&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mNBmnMkSMCM&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br />[1] <a href="http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html">http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html</a><br />[2] David Schubert, personal communication to H. Penfound, Greenpeace Canada, October 25, 2002.<br />[3] Irina Ermakova, “Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary studies,” Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4–9.<br />[4] Irina Ermakova, “Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,” Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June 12, 2007<br />[5] Irina Ermakova, “Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,” Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June 12, 2007<br />[6] L. Vecchio et al, “Ultrastructural Analysis of Testes from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,” European Journal of Histochemistry 48, no. 4 (Oct–Dec 2004):449–454.<br />[7] Oliveri et al., “Temporary Depression of Transcription in Mouse Pre-implantion Embryos from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,” 48th Symposium of the Society for Histochemistry, Lake Maggiore (Italy), September 7–10, 2006.<br />[8] Alberta Velimirov and Claudia Binter, “Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice,” Forschungsberichte der Sektion IV, Band 3/2008<br />[9] Jerry Rosman, personal communication, 2006<br />[10] See for example, A. Dutton, H. Klein, J. Romeis, and F. Bigler, “Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperia carnea,” Ecological Entomology 27 (2002): 441–7; and J. Romeis, A. Dutton, and F. Bigler, “Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae),” Journal of Insect Physiology 50, no. 2–3 (2004): 175–183.<br />[11] Washington State Department of Health, “Report of health surveillance activities: Asian gypsy moth control program,” (Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Health, 1993).<br />[12] M. Green, et al., “Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,” Amer. J. Public Health 80, no. 7(1990): 848–852.[13] Ashish Gupta et. al., “Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers’ Health (in Barwani and Dhar District of Madhya Pradesh),” Investigation Report, Oct–Dec 2005.<br />[14] Sunday India, October, 26, 2008<br />[15] October 24, 2005 correspondence between Arpad Pusztai and Brian John<br />[16] John M. Burns, “13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,” December 17, 2002 <a href="http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/fullratstudy.pdf">http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/fullratstudy.pdf</a><br />[17] Alberto Finamore, et al, “Intestinal and Peripheral Immune Response to MON810 Maize Ingestion in Weaning and Old Mice,” J. Agric. Food Chem., 2008, 56 (23), pp 11533–11539, November 14, 2008<br />[18] See L Zolla, et al, “Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications,” J Proteome Res. 2008 May;7(5):1850-61; Hye-Yung Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Kyung-Eun Lee, Myung-Hyun Sohn, Kyu-Earn Kim, “Genetically Modified and Wild Soybeans: An immunologic comparison,” Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 26, no. 3 (May–June 2005): 210-216(7); and Gendel, “The use of amino acid sequence alignments to assess potential allergenicity of proteins used in genetically modified foods,” Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 42 (1998), 45–62.<br />[19] A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz, “GMO in animal nutrition: potential benefits and risks,” Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals, R. Mosenthin, J. Zentek and T. Zebrowska (Eds.) Elsevier, October 2005<br />[20] Hye-Yung Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Kyung-Eun Lee, Myung-Hyun Sohn, Kyu-Earn Kim, “Genetically Modified and Wild Soybeans: An immunologic comparison,” Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 26, no. 3 (May–June 2005): 210-216(7).<br />[21] “Mortality in Sheep Flocks after Grazing on Bt Cotton Fields—Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh” Report of the Preliminary Assessment, April 2006, <a href="http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp">http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp</a><br />[22] Personal communication and visit, January 2009.<br />[23] Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007<br />[24] Arpad Pusztai, “Can Science Give Us the Tools for Recognizing Possible Health Risks for GM Food?” Nutrition and Health 16 (2002): 73–84.<br />[25] Stéphane Foucart, “Controversy Surrounds a GMO,” Le Monde, 14 December 2004; referencing, John M. Burns, “13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,” December 17, 2002 <a href="http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/fullratstudy.pdf">http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/fullratstudy.pdf</a><br />[26] Netherwood et al, “Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,” Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2.<br />[27] See memos at <a href="http://www.biointegrity.org/">http://www.biointegrity.org/</a><br />[28] José Domingo, “Toxicity Studies of Genetically Modified Plants : A Review of the Published Literature,” Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2007, vol. 47, no8, pp. 721-733<br />[29] Angela Hall, “Suzuki warns against hastily accepting GMOs”, The Leader-Post (Canada), 26 April 2005.<br />[30] Kathryn Anne Paez, et al, “Rising Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Chronic Conditions: A Ten-Year Trend,” Health Affairs, 28, no. 1 (2009): 15-25Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-90484360193192671452009-06-13T00:00:00.002-04:002009-06-13T00:00:19.195-04:00Twelve Creative Ways to Use Coconut Oil<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Elizabeth Walling, citizen journalist<br /><br /><strong>In the past several years, (Raw, Organic) coconut oil has become a sort of rising star in the world of health food. More and more homes have a jar of organic extra virgin coconut oil on their pantry shelf. But coconut oil is more than a healthy cooking alternative. There are endless ways to use coconut oil that extend far beyond the occasional cookie or stir-fry. Here are twelve creative uses for a classic health food:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Colds and Sore Throats</em> - Coconut oil has antimicrobial properties that can help you recover from a cold. Mix it with warm tea and honey for a very soothing throat remedy.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Cuts and Scrapes</em> - Coconut oil can be used as a topical cream for common cuts and scrapes, protecting against infection while conditioning the skin to heal faster. It may also prevent scarring.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Dandruff</em> - Several times per week, coat your fingertips with </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/coconut_oil.html"><strong>coconut oil</strong></a><strong> and massage it into your scalp for an easy dandruff cure. This is an effective yet gentle method, suitable for young children or babies with cradle cap, too.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Deodorant</em> - You can use coconut oil by itself as a </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/deodorant.html"><strong>deodorant</strong></a><strong> that leaves underarms feeling silky soft, or you can add baking </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/soda.html"><strong>soda</strong></a><strong> and cornstarch for advanced odor protection.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Detoxification</em> - There are many methods for detoxifying the body, but coconut oil is unique because it can provide energy while cleansing the body. One popular method is to take 1-2 tablespoon of coconut oil seven times per day for one to seven days to cleanse the body from toxins, impurities and candida.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Fungal Infections</em> - Coconut oil contains strong antifungal agents, and can be used to treat fungal </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/infections.html"><strong>infections</strong></a><strong> like athlete's foot, ringworm, thrush and vaginal yeast infections. You can use it internally and topically for these conditions.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Hair Conditioner</em> - Apply a thin layer of coconut oil to your scalp and hair. Allow it to soak for several minutes and then wash as usual. There is no need to use other conditioners with this method, even after washing with shampoo.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Lip Balm</em> - Lip moisturizers are filled with </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/chemicals.html"><strong>chemicals</strong></a><strong>, and natural products are often pricey. If you need a </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/moisturizer.html"><strong>moisturizer</strong></a><strong> for your lips, try coconut oil in a commercial </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/lip_balm.html"><strong>lip balm</strong></a><strong> container.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Make-up Remover</em> - Coconut oil is a very effective make-up remover, so you can toss out all the chemical-laden products from the drug store. It's also a natural moisturizer, so it won't cause dryness or irritation.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Skin Conditions</em> - Since coconut oil is moisturizing, antimicrobial, antifungal and anti-inflammatory, it's a great natural remedy for all kinds of skin problems ranging from eczema to acne to diaper rash.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Sun screen</em> - Coconut oil provides effective and natural sun protection without exposing your body to the toxic chemicals and metals in conventional sun block. Coconut oil protects against free radicals, which provides added protection against skin cancer.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>Toothpaste</em> - Mix an equal amount of coconut oil and baking soda for an all-natural, fluoride-free </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/toothpaste.html"><strong>toothpaste</strong></a><strong>. Add spearmint or peppermint oil with stevia for a fresh, sweet flavor.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As you can see, there is more to coconut oil that what meets the eye - or the frying pan!</strong><br /><br /><br />For More Information:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.passionatehomemaking.com/2009/03/all-the-wonderful-uses-of-coconut-oil.html">http://www.passionatehomemaking.com/2009/03/all-the-wonderful-uses-of-coconut-oil.html</a><br /><a href="http://www.care2.com/greenliving/6-healthy-uses-for-coconut-oil.html">http://www.care2.com/greenliving/6-healthy-uses-for-coconut-oil.html</a><br /><a href="http://www.tebyan.net/social/nutrition/2008/11/12/78585.html">http://www.tebyan.net/social/nutrition/2008/11/12/78585.html</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-25786535164618295972009-06-12T19:00:00.002-04:002009-06-12T19:00:19.218-04:00Cinnamon is a Wonder Spice for Health and Wellbeing<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Sheryl Walters, citizen journalist<br /><br /><strong>Cinnamon is well known as the world's oldest spice. It has a beautiful warm aroma that makes it an inviting ingredient to add to food. In the past, Cinnamon was seen as an expensive luxury that was used as an aphrodisiac, and as it was more expensive to buy than silver, many people simply used it as currency. It is a wonder spice for health and wellbeing.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Apart from its amazing taste and aroma that made it so popular for cooking, cinnamon was also used by many physicians to treat colds, coughing, and sore throats. Burning Cinnamon in households was thought to cleanse the air and the people within. Roman Emperor Nero took this literally and after he murdered his wife he ordered a year's supply of </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cinnamon.html"><strong>cinnamon</strong></a><strong> to be burnt to cleanse him of the crime.While burning cinnamon may not actually be able to clean out your soul, modern day research has found that this most ancient of spices is very good for your </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html"><strong>health</strong></a><strong>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Cinnamon And Diabetes</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Studies into the effects of cinnamon on people with </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/diabetes.html"><strong>diabetes</strong></a><strong> are at this stage very minimal. But the extremely positive results have the medical </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/community.html"><strong>community</strong></a><strong> screaming for larger trials. In one study conducted in the Malmo University Hospital in Sweden, results showed that eating a meal laced with cinnamon actually lowered the food's effects on blood sugar levels. The test only included 14 people half of whom were given normal rice pudding while the other half had rice pudding with cinnamon. They repeated the test again at a later date and came up with the same results. The researchers led by Joanna Hlebowicz believe that cinnamon may slow down part of the digestion process giving the body more time to break up the carbohydrates, therefore lessening the post-meal blood-glucose concentration.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Cinnamon And Arthritis</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Another test conducted in Copenhagen seems to have found that cinnamon mixed with </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/honey.html"><strong>honey</strong></a><strong> can significantly reduce the pain associated with </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/arthritis.html"><strong>arthritis</strong></a><strong>. The study was conducted on 200 arthritis suffers who were all given a honey and cinnamon mixture before they ate breakfast. All of the patients tested reported some improvement in their pain management while 73 of those seemed to be relieved of all pain within a month. The results have astounded the medical community and brought hope to the thousands of chronic arthritis sufferers in the world.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>While these tests are by no means conclusive, anything that may produce a positive result in the battle against these diseases without any nasty side effects is definitely worth trying.</strong><br /><br /><a href="http://altmedicine.about.com/od/cinnamon/a/cinnamon.htm">http://altmedicine.about.com/od/cinnamon/a/cinnamon.htm</a><br /><a href="http://www.healthdiaries.com/eatthis/10-health-benefits-of-cinnamon.html">http://www.healthdiaries.com/eatthis/10-health-benefits-of-cinnamon.html</a><br /><a href="http://www.organicfacts.net/organic-oils/natural-essential-oils/health-benefits-of-cinnamon-oil.html">http://www.organicfacts.net/organic-oils/natural-essential-oils/health-benefits-of-cinnamon-oil.html</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-51346075723473166782009-05-29T12:00:00.001-04:002009-05-29T12:01:35.661-04:00Top 10 Ways to Know You're Living in a Medical Police State<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Mike Adams, NaturalNews Editor<br /><br /><strong>Are Americans really living in a medical police state? The recent news with Daniel Hauser and his family's fight over chemotherapy seems to indicate so. Here are ten ways to recognize whether you're living under the oppressive tyranny of a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#1 - If an armed U.S. Marshall is posted outside your house at night -- just to make sure you don't escape "treatment" -- you're probably living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Source: "Daniel was allowed to spend the night at home, but County Attorney James Olson said a deputy was posted at the Hauser farm in Sleepy Eye." (FoxNews)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#2 - If saying "I'd rather not inject my child with that poison" to your doctor results in him calling Child Protective Services, you're most likely living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#3 - If a nationwide manhunt (involving FBI agents) is unleashed just to find you and drag you back to the </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/hospital.html"><strong>hospital</strong></a><strong> to submit to dangerous pharmaceuticals, there's little doubt you're living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#4 - If you find yourself suddenly wondering if you should flee to Mexico in order to find freedom, you're probably living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#5 - If doctors call the police to prevent you from visiting competing </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cancer.html"><strong>cancer</strong></a><strong> clinics outside the country, that's a warning sign that you're living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#6 - If your doctor claims to be practicing "integrative medicine" but then calls the police when you don't submit to </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/chemotherapy.html"><strong>chemotherapy</strong></a><strong>, you're definitely living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Quote from Daniel Hauser's oncologist, Dr. Bostrom: "Although I've had patients concerned about getting chemo, this is the first time I've ever had to report someone." Source: </strong><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Cancer..." target="_blank"><strong>http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Cancer...</strong></a><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#7 - If you're blasted by the mainstream media for supporting a mother's right to protect her teenage son from an injection of toxic chemicals, you're almost certainly living in a medical police state (populated by sheeple).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#8 - If you walk into a hospital and they handcuff you, steal your child and forcibly inject him with dangerous poisons while explaining, "It's for your own good," then you're almost certainly living in a medical police state.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#9 - If the State calls you "medically negligent" for feeding your child raw foods, or medicinal herbs, or holistic </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/diets.html"><strong>diets</strong></a><strong> that are free from sugar, red meat and chemical additives, then you're definitely living in a medical police state. (Fact: Parents who feed their children diets of raw, living foods have been accused of medical neglect.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>#10 - If you disagree with your psychiatrist, and in response he diagnosis you with "Oppositional Defiance Disorder" and demands you take his mind-altering psych drugs, you are absolutely living in a medical police state!</strong>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-74792563286792939902009-05-07T12:00:00.001-04:002009-05-07T12:00:12.517-04:00Germany Bans Genetically Modified Corn<a href="http://www.mercola.com/">Mercola.com</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Germany has banned the cultivation of GM corn, arguing that the corn breed MON 810 is dangerous for the environment. But that argument might not stand up in court, and Germany could face fines totaling millions of euros if Monsanto decides to challenge the prohibition.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Under the new regulations, the cultivation of MON 810, a GM corn produced by Monsanto, will be prohibited in Germany. A clause in EU law allows individual countries to impose such bans. Environmental groups welcomed the ban, pointing out that numerous scientific studies demonstrated GM corn was a danger to the environment.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>However, it may be hard to prove conclusively that MON 810 damages the environment, which could enable Monsanto to win a court case opposing the ban. Monsanto has said that it would look as quickly as possible into whether it would begin legal proceedings.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>MON 810 had been the only GM crop that could be grown in Germany. The plant produces a toxin to fight off a certain pest, the larvae of the corn borer moth. MON 810 is already banned in five other EU member states: Austria, Hungary, Greece, France and Luxembourg.</strong><br /><br /><br />Sources:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,618913,00.html">Spiegel Online April 14, 2009</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/05/Germany-Bans-Genetically-Modified-Corn.aspx">CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-50761140318895047872009-05-06T12:00:00.002-04:002009-05-06T12:21:05.912-04:00Could Monsanto Be Responsible for One Indian Farmer's Death Every Thirty Minutes?<a href="http://www.mercola.com/">Mercola.com</a><br /><br /><strong>Over 1,500 farmers in the agricultural Indian state of Chattisgarh have committed suicide after being driven to debt by crop failure. The state was hit hard by falling water levels.<br /><br />Bharatendu Prakash, of the Organic Farming Association of India, said that, "Farmers' suicides are increasing due to a vicious circle created by money lenders. They lure farmers to take money but when the crops fail, they are left with no option other than death."<br /><br />Mr. Prakash added that the government needs to take up the cause of the poor farmers just as they fight for a strong economy.</strong><br /><br /><br /><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Av6dx9yNiCA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Av6dx9yNiCA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/05/Could-Monsanto-Be-Responsible-for-One-Indian-Farmers-Death-Every-Thirty-Minutes.aspx"><strong>CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE</strong></a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-47257176651333416282009-05-04T12:00:00.002-04:002009-05-04T12:18:33.084-04:00Unconscionable Police Raid on Family's Home and Organic Food Co-op<a href="http://www.mercola.com/">Mercola.com</a><br /><br /><br /><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FdLxMKuxyr4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FdLxMKuxyr4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-size:130%;">Steps have been taken to start legal action against the Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) and the Lorain County Health Department for violating the constitutional rights of John and Jacqueline Stowers of LaGrange, Ohio.<br /><br />The Stowers operate an organic food cooperative called Manna Storehouse. ODA and Lorain County Health Department agents forcefully raided their home and seized the family's personal food supply, cell phones and personal computers.<br /><br />On the morning of December 1, 2008, law enforcement officers forcefully entered the Stowers' residence without first announcing they were police or stating the purpose of the visit. With guns drawn, they swiftly and immediately moved to the upstairs of the home, where ten children were in the middle of a home-schooling lesson. Officers then moved Jacqueline Stowers and her children to their living room, where they were held for more than six hours.<br /><br />There has never been a complaint filed against Manna Storehouse or the Stowers related to the quality or healthfulness of the food distributed through the co-op.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/02/Unconscionable-Police-Raid-on-Familys-Home-and-Organic-Food-CoOp.aspx"><span style="font-size:130%;">Click here for Dr. Mercola's comments.</span></a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-13683405658269243262009-04-29T12:00:00.000-04:002009-04-29T12:00:08.807-04:00Congressman Paul on the Recent Swine Flu Scare<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TB5-Y08qbjo&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TB5-Y08qbjo&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-78420284448178033272009-04-07T12:00:00.001-04:002009-04-07T12:00:06.905-04:00Irradiated Foods Cause Severe Neurological Damage<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Sherry Baker, Health Sciences Editor<br /><br /><strong>In a study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW-Madison) report on cats developing severe neurological symptoms due to a degradation of myelin, the fatty insulator of nerve fibers called axons. Because myelin facilitates the conduction of nerve signals, when it is lost or damaged there can be impairment of sensation, movement, thinking and other functions, depending on what particular nerves are affected. This loss of myelin is found in several disorders of the central </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/nervous_system.html"><strong>nervous system</strong></a><strong> in humans -- the best known being multiple sclerosis (MS).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So what caused the cats to develop neurological problems? Although the researchers' statement to the media practically buries the fact, a close read shows <span style="color:#ff0000;">the animals were fine until fed irradiated </span></strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/food.html"><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">food</span></strong></a><strong>. What's more, when they were taken off the irradiated diet, the animals' nervous systems began healing.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The new study took place when the researchers were faced with reports of a mysterious illness in pregnant cats. A commercial company had been testing various diets on the animals to see how the food impacted growth and development in the felines. The food used, it turns out, had been irradiated. <span style="color:#ff0000;">Irradiation, which is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for many human as well as animal </span></strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/foods.html"><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">foods</span></strong></a><strong>, involves exposing foods briefly to a radiant energy source such as gamma rays or electron beams in order to kill bacteria.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Some of the cats eating the irradiated cat food exhibited very severe neurological symptoms, including movement disorders, vision loss and even paralysis. "After being on the diet for three to four months, the pregnant cats started to develop progressive neurological </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/disease.html"><strong>disease</strong></a><strong>," said Ian Duncan, a professor of medical sciences at the UW-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine and an authority on demyelinating diseases, in a statement to the media.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The sick cats were shown to have widely distributed the very severe demyelization of the central nervous system. Their neurological symptoms were very much like those seen in people with MS and other demyelization disorders. When the felines were taken off the </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/irradiated_foods.html"><strong>irradiated foods</strong></a><strong>, they began to recover slowly. However, according to Dr. Duncan, the restored myelin sheaths were no longer as thick as normal myelin sheaths.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The finding is important, the scientists concluded in their study, because it shows the central nervous system retains the ability to reestablish myelin -- so strategies that could be developed to spur the growth of new myelin sheaths anywhere nerves themselves are preserved could be a possible therapy for treating a host of severe neurological diseases in humans. "The key thing is that it absolutely confirms the notion that remyelinating strategies are clinically important," Duncan stated.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Curiously, although the scientists' related their findings to possible human applications, they were quick to dismiss a possible connection between people, irradiated food and </span></strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html"><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">health</span></strong></a><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;"> risk. "We think it is extremely unlikely that (irradiated food) could become a human health problem," Duncan explained in the media statement. "We think it is species specific."</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">However, not everyone agrees irradiated food is fine for humans or animals. According to the Center for Food Safety, studies have shown </span></strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/irradiation.html"><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">irradiation</span></strong></a><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;"> produces volatile toxic chemicals such as benzene and toluene, which are known or suspected to cause cancer and birth defects. A 2001 study found an association between colon tumors and 2-alkylcyclobutanones (2-ACB's), a new chemical compound detected only in foods that have been irradiated.</span></strong><br /><br /><br />For more information:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/..." target="_blank">http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/...</a><br /><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/23/n..." target="_blank">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/23/n...</a><br /><a href="http://www.fda.gov/opacom/catalog/i..." target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/opacom/catalog/i...</a><br /><br /><br />About the author:<br /><br />Sherry Baker is a widely published writer whose work has appeared in Newsweek, Health, the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, Yoga Journal, Optometry, Atlanta, Arthritis Today, Natural Healing Newsletter, OMNI, UCLA's "Healthy Years" newsletter, Mount Sinai School of Medicine's "Focus on Health Aging" newsletter, the Cleveland Clinic's "Men's Health Advisor" newsletter and many others.Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-75782700921032970472009-04-07T07:00:00.001-04:002009-04-07T07:00:18.373-04:00Breastfeeding Shown to Decrease the Risk of SIDS<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Sheryl Walters, citizen journalist<br /><br /><strong>SIDS is the sudden unexplained death of an infant and is the number one cause of death in U.S babies less than one year old. Fortunately the SIDS rate has dropped over 50% since 1983, but it is still responsible for 2500 deaths each year according to the American SIDS Institute. There are many hypotheses for why SIDS happens but there is no known cause. Factors such as stomach sleeping, a smoker in the house, and blankets in a baby's bed increases the risk. Research has shown that a baby who is breastfed has a much lower risk of dying of SIDS than a formula fed baby.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The benefits of </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/breastfeeding.html"><strong>breastfeeding</strong></a><strong> in general are very well known. Breastfed babies are less likely to get infections because of the maternal antibodies in breast milk. Illnesses that they are less likely to get include ear infections, stomach viruses, diarrhea, and respiratory infections. In addition, breastfed babies have a lower risk of obesity, asthma, Type I and II diabetes, and childhood leukemia.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In fact, breastfeeding is known to be so beneficial that the Centers for Disease Control (</strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/CDC.html"><strong>CDC</strong></a><strong>) has included breastfeeding as part of its Healthy People 2010 Objectives. The goals stated in these objectives are to have the percentage of breastfed newborns at 75%, infants still breastfeeding at 6 months old at 50%, and babies breastfeeding at one year old at 25%. Data collected by the CDC in 2004 reported these figures at about 73%, 42%, and 21%, respectively.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In addition to reducing the risk of </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/disease.html"><strong>disease</strong></a><strong>, breastfeeding has been shown to reduce the risk of dying from SIDS. Breastfeeding is beneficial for this for a number of reasons.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>*Breathing: Breastmilk is non-irritating to airways like a foreign material such as formula could be. In addition, if aspirated breastmilk is less likely to cause apnea.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>*Swallowing: Learning to coordinate swallowing and </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/breathing.html"><strong>breathing</strong></a><strong> is important in reducing SIDS risk. Research has shown that breastfed babies learn to coordinate more quickly than bottlefed babies because they are usually fed more often (so they get more practice) and also because breastfed babies tend to have better alignment of the jaw and muscles which helps to keep airways open.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>*Reflux: Breastfed babies are less likely to have gastric reflux which can increase risk of SIDS.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>*Mother/child connection: Breastfed mothers have hormonal cues that keep them more in tune with their baby during the night. As a result they may be more likely to read changes during their baby's breathing or sleep rhythm.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Breastfeeding is so beneficial to babies in countless ways. Decreasing the risk of SIDS is a huge incentive to encourage mothers to breastfeed their babies.</strong><br /><br /><br />Sources:<br /><br />American SIDS Institute, (<a href="http://www.sids.org/" target="_blank">www.sids.org</a>)<br /><br />Ask Dr. Sears, (<a href="http://www.askdrsears.com/html/10/T" target="_blank">http://www.askdrsears.com/html/10/T...</a>)<br /><br />Benefits of Breastfeeding, (<a href="http://www.womenshealth.gov/breastf" target="_blank">http://www.womenshealth.gov/breastf...</a>)<br /><br />Breastfeeding Among U.S. Children Born 1999-2005, CDC National Immunization Survey, (<a href="http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/NIS_data/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/da...</a>)Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-68783379584369329472009-04-01T12:00:00.000-04:002009-04-01T12:00:15.727-04:00Red Meat Eaters More Likely to Die from Cancer or Heart Disease<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Louis Lazaris<br /><br /><strong>A controlled study conducted in the U.S by researchers at the National Cancer Institute indicates that men and women whose diets are high in red or processed meats are more likely to die from cancer or heart disease. The study included data collected over a 10-year period between 1995 and 2005, and involved half a million males and females between the ages of 50 and 71.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>According to the results of the study, published this week in the Archives of Internal Medicine, those who ate 4 ounces of </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/red_meat.html"><strong>red meat</strong></a><strong> per day - or a serving equal to a small steak - had a more than 30 percent increased mortality rate compared to those who ate the smallest amount of red meat.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Last week the Ottawa Citizen reported that the Canadian Cancer Society, in response to the study, is planning to change its recommended limit on red and </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/processed_meats.html"><strong>processed meats</strong></a><strong>. Heather Chappell, the Canadian Cancer Society's senior manager of </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cancer.html"><strong>cancer</strong></a><strong> control policy says, "This takes it that next step and actually looks at the impact that has on </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cancer_deaths.html"><strong>cancer deaths</strong></a><strong>. This really is a significant addition to our body of knowledge in this area."</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>322,263 men and 223,390 women from eight U.S. states filled out questionnaires detailing their usual </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/food.html"><strong>food</strong></a><strong> and drink consumption. The red meat included beef, cold cuts, hamburger, liver, pork, </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/sausage.html"><strong>sausage</strong></a><strong>, as well as meats in prepared meals such as pizza and lasagna. White meat included chicken, turkey, fish, cold cuts, tuna, and sausages made from poultry.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The heaviest </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/meat_eaters.html"><strong>meat eaters</strong></a><strong> ate about 8 1/2 servings of meat per week and had a 31 percent increase in mortality rates in comparison to the lightest meat eaters, who consumed about one serving of meat per week.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Jennifer Macey of Australia's AM radio broadcast interviewed one of the authors of the study, Dr. Rashmi Sinha, to inquire about methods used to ensure that results were due to red and </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/processed_meat.html"><strong>processed meat</strong></a><strong> consumption and not due to other factors.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Sinha explains, "We were controlled for many different factors such as body mass index, family history of cancer, alcohol intake, education, smoking, other dietary factors, so we tried to control to the best of our ability with the information that we had."</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The researchers reported that if the lowest level of intake of meats was consumed by all participants, 11 percent of deaths in men and 16 percent of deaths in women could have been prevented.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Cancer deaths increased by 22 percent, and cardiovascular-related deaths increased by 27 percent among the heavy meat eaters that were male. For females, the increases in death rates among the heavy meat eaters were 20 percent for cancer and 50 percent for </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/heart_disease.html"><strong>heart disease</strong></a><strong>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>This study was much broader in scope than past studies that have compared death rates in different types of meat eaters. Prior studies have been conducted involving </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/vegetarian.html"><strong>vegetarian</strong></a><strong> populations in the U.S. and Europe, as well as on Seventh-Day Adventists, who promote a vegetarian diet.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Sinha explained, "They combined their results, so it was a bit more ambiguous. This is a big study. That's what's interesting."</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>These results come on the heels of a similar study conducted in the U.K. that analyzed data from 52,700 men and women. In that U.K. study, those that did not eat meat had a significantly lower risk of cancer than those that did eat meat.</strong><br /><br /><br />Sources:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/20..." target="_blank">http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/20...</a><br /><a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health..." target="_blank">http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health...</a><br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7..." target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7...</a><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevent..." target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevent...</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-60176735964211783382009-03-24T07:00:00.001-04:002009-03-24T07:00:35.929-04:00How To Legally Say "NO" To All Vaccines!By: Crusador Interviews Book Author & Acclaimed International Vaccine Expert Dr. Sherri Tenpenny<br /><br /><a href="http://www.healthtruthrevealed.com/">http://www.healthtruthrevealed.com</a><br /><br />March 20, 2009<br /><br /><strong>Millions of Americans have come to distrust vaccines and mainstream medicine’s vaccine agenda. There is a growing movement in this country and around the world that questions the safety and effectiveness of all vaccines for obvious reasons. Many childhood disorders such as autism, ADD/ADHD, SIDS and others have been linked to vaccines. Thousands of soldiers who served in the military have been severely disabled or in some cases even died after receiving their mandated shots. Vaccines are the most controversial subject in all of medicine.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The standard line heard from most parents once their eyes are open to the risks of vaccines is, “How will I get my child into day care or in school without their shots.” Those working in the healthcare field or soldiers in the military are faced with similar questions.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>To help educate the people further about how to legally avoid all vaccines, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has put together a brand new book that is absolutely necessary to have in your possession if you (or a loved one) don’t want to vaccinate but are not sure how to get around it. As Dr. Tenpenny says on the back cover of her book, “Saying No To Vaccines is not intended to be a balanced view of vaccination literature. Pro-vaccine information is readily accessible through the American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, healthcare and government-sponsored organizations. This book balances the debate.”</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Below is a copy of an interview Crusador editor Greg Ciola conducted with Dr. Tenpenny shortly after the release of her new book.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: What was the impetus for writing your new book “Saying NO To Vaccines”?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Parents needed a tool that did their homework for them. The evidence is there to support their decision to not vaccinate; you just have to do a little work to find it. Everyone seems to be so afraid of “bugs” and their potential ability to make us sick. But the reality is that we swim in “bugs” every day and we are not dropping over like flies. The only “bugs” we seem to obsess over are associated with vaccines. Only two generations ago, measles, mumps and chickenpox were normal experiences of childhood. Why we have complete fear of these infections is media and money driven and unfounded.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">If the focus of Public Health was on sleep, exercise, clean water and safe, non-GMO food, we would have a healthy society without vaccines…but we would not have billion dollar industries employing millions of people to keep us “healthy.” The fact is, we are a very UNhealthy society with vaccines, so the Public health and argument that we must vaccinate ‘for greater good’ is a failure.</span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I put a large body of research into my first book, FOWL! and my two DVDS, documenting the dangers of vaccination. “Saying No To Vaccines” was the next logical step. It answers the question, “I’ve decided not to vaccinate, now what do I do?”</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: What are some of the issues you cover in the book that aren’t covered in your two DVD’s “Vaccines: The Risks, The Benefits, The Choices” and “Vaccines: What CDC Documents and Science Reveal”?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>There is very little overlap between Saying No to Vaccines and the DVDs. The foundational premise of the book is to give answers refuting the 25 most common arguments used to promote vaccination. For example, parents are often told the vaccine-preventable diseases of childhood can be serious and if their child is not vaccinated, their child could die. I tell them how to refute that argument and give documentation from the medical literature to demonstrate that statement is nothing more than fear mongering. Parents are told by pediatricians there is “no evidence that vaccination harms the immune system” and there is “no evidence that vaccination can lead to chronic disease.” I used the medical literature to prove the opposite is true.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: What are the most common questions you get about vaccines?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The most frequently-asked question I get is about vaccination exemption, meaning, “How do I refuse the vaccine and still get my kids into school or keep my job,” so by design a large part of the book covers exemptions. I included a lot of detail on how to avoid vaccinations for school situations, including college, professional situations where a job may require certain vaccines, if you are in a nursing home, foreign adoption, the military, even if you are incarcerated. I have also included a chapter on frequently- asked questions about vaccination. Saying No To Vaccines has an entire section on “most frequently asked questions.”</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: There is a huge divide in this country between those who think you should vaccinate versus those who feel you shouldn’t. The majority is still on the side of thinking that vaccines are THE answer to long-term immunity. When you do speaking engagements or radio interviews or simply talk to a pregnant woman about the need to question the safety of vaccines further, how do you present your information to make someone think twice?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Even though I strongly believe that vaccines cause more harm than the “good” they supposedly do, it is important for people to see the evidence of harm – from a scientific perspective – and not just take my word for it. All of my information, every slide and every paragraph in my book, is referenced from a highly reputable medical journal or from the Centers for Disease Control, the CDC. People can see for themselves the one-sided, biased view of the vaccine industry, promoting that vaccines are “safe” and “protective.” Almost 100% of the time, once people pull back the veil and see the rest of the story, they know that vaccination is not what the drug companies claim it to be.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: Do you feel that there is such a thing as a “safe” vaccine? If there isn’t, how do you counter the mainstream medical mentality that vaccines may not be entirely without risks, but those risks are far less than the risks we would face without vaccines at all?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I really felt that parents needed strong answers for when they decided to not vaccinate. Very few people are willing to say something. The risk of the vaccine is greater than the risk of the disease. The “Green Our Vaccines” movement was partially behind the reason I wrote this book. Many activists, people with very good intentions, hedge and put their support behind “safer” vaccines which are a chemical impossibility. People just need to SAY NO.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: Tell our readers a little more about the exemption clauses you discuss in your book. The medical establishment has done a terrific job of intimidating people into thinking they have to take vaccines and yet, rarely if ever will you hear about the ways to exempt yourself and family from taking vaccines.</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>A medical exemption is available in all 50 states but must be recommended by a doctor. The exemption can be difficult to obtain and often, it only excuses future vaccination with a shot that has already caused a severe reaction.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>There are three exemptions available in this country – medical, religious and philosophical. As of now, 19 states accept a philosophical exemption. It is the easiest of the three to use. You request a form from the school nurse, state the reasons you don’t want to vaccinate your child, sign it and give it to the school. Generally, that’s it. However, different school systems have different rules. Some require the form annually, some require both parents to sign the exemption form, some require it to be notarized and so forth. You can find links to your state laws and more information by going to </strong><a href="http://www.drtenpenny.com/"><strong>www.DrTenpenny.com</strong></a><strong> .</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Religious exemptions are available in all other states except West Virginia and Mississippi (which only have medical exemptions). Religious exemptions can be tricky and in some states, very difficult to obtain and defend. I often recommend that people consult an attorney for this type of exemption. Some states, such as New York and New Jersey, are difficult. New York has been known to use something called a “sincerity test.” Parents are literally interrogated by an attorney representing the school district regarding how sincere their religious assertions are for refusing a vaccine. A panel then decides if you are sincere enough in your beliefs to allow you to refuse vaccination on religious ground. I find these tactics absolutely appalling and akin to Inquisitioners of the Middle Ages.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: Where do you see the whole pro-vaccine movement going and what threats to our Constitutional freedoms do you see coming down the pike?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The dogged determination of those who oppose vaccines, and in particular mandatory vaccination, has gained traction at a grass roots level and garnered a lot of attention from the media. I feel that we have the pro-vaccinators on the ropes. Our arguments are hard to deny and the global autism epidemic can no longer be ignored. Pro-vaccinators are using manipulation, threats and fear tactics, trying to convince everyone that vaccines are not only safe but absolutely necessary. I see the vaccine industry like a wounded Tyrannosaurus Rex, gnashing its teeth and flailing its ugly head. It won’t die quickly and it will probably get worse before it gets better.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: There are many people in this country, myself included, who are concerned that there is an evil agenda to mass vaccinate the entire planet in the event of a health emergency. Do you feel that there are genuine reasons to be concerned and what might we expect to see unfold in an emergency?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Executive orders and recommendations from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have been written that stop just short of allowing government-enforced mandatory vaccination for anthrax, smallpox and bird flu. The only way to change these policies is by standing together and boldly saying no.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: Are you still confident that with enough knowledge about the risks and dangers of vaccines enough people will wake up and say NO before Big Pharma forces its will upon the populace?</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">I’m not sure. People tend to be sheep – Americans in particular. Look what we have allowed a small number in the White House and 545 people in Congress to do to our country. And even those people who want to effect a change have little time and few resources to do so. No one wants to stand out, speak up and challenge authority. Whatever happened to those bra-burning activists of the 1960s? However, people really are involved now, more than ever. It only takes a small, vocal minority to really make a difference. As stated years ago by Margaret Mead, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has.”</span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Crusador: Thank you for your time, Sherri. These are excellent answers. I encourage everyone reading this interview to make every effort they can to get a copy of your new book and share it with their friends and loved ones because it is a great tool to give the average person confidence to “SAY NO TO VACCINES”.</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Thank you, Greg for helping me get this message out to more people. </strong>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-44670131440368801512009-03-23T19:00:00.001-04:002009-03-23T19:00:12.037-04:00Cooking Broccoli Destroys 90+ Percent of Anti-Cancer Compound Sulforaphane<strong></strong><br /><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><strong></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Levels of the beneficial, cancer-fighting compound sulforaphane in broccoli are reduced by 90 percent when the vegetable is cooked, according to a study conducted by researchers from TNO Quality of Life in the Netherlands, and published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.<br /><br />"Consumption of raw broccoli resulted in faster absorption, higher bioavailability, and higher peak plasma amounts of sulforaphane, compared to cooked broccoli," the researchers wrote.<br /><br />Eight male participants were fed 200 grams of crushed raw or crushed cooked broccoli as part of a warm meal; researchers then measured the men's blood and urine levels of sulforaphane. Based on these measurements, the researchers calculated that while the sulforaphane in raw broccoli had a bioavailability of 37 percent, this dropped to only 3.4 percent when the vegetable was cooked.<br /><br />Furthermore, it took longer for the sulforaphane from cooked broccoli to be absorbed by the body. Optimal levels of sulforaphane were observed in the blood and urine of participants 1.6 hours after eating raw broccoli, but these levels were not reached among consumers of cooked broccoli for six hours.<br /><br />The cruciferous vegetables, also known as Brassicaceae, include broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, arugula, Brussels sprouts, collard greens, daikon, garden cress, horseradish, kale, kohlrabi, mustard, radish, rape (canola), rapini, rutabaga , tatsoi, turnip, wasabi and watercress. Numerous studies have linked higher intake of these vegetables to lower rates of cancer and other health problems, particularly when the vegetables are consumed raw.<br /><br />One of the plant compounds identified as partially responsible for this protective effect is sulforaphane, the main member of the isothiocyanate family that is found in broccoli. All cruciferous vegetables contain plant compounds known as glucosinolates, which are metabolized by the body into cancer-fighting isothiocyanates.<br /><br />Studies have suggested that sulforaphane may help activate genes that produce antioxidants to clear dangerous free radicals from the body. This effect is believed to be partially responsible for the observed lower rates in breast, bladder, cervix, colon, endometrium, liver and lung cancers among those who eat large quantities of cruciferous vegetables. It is also believed to help protect the immune and other bodily systems from age-related decline.<br /><br />Sulforaphane is also believed to reduce inflammation, which can transform precancerous cells into tumors and has also been linked to other chronic health problems such as heart disease and diabetes. At least one study has suggested that the chemical can even prevent the blood vessels of diabetics against the damage caused by high blood sugar.<br /><br />The current study is not the first to suggest that most of broccoli's health benefits are destroyed by cooking. Recent research from the International Agency for Cancer Research found lower cancer rates among those who consumed at least three servings of raw cruciferous vegetables per month. This mirrors the results of an earlier study by researchers from the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, N.Y., who found a 40 percent lower risk of bladder cancer among those who ate that many raw cruciferous vegetables.<br /><br />There was no protective effect observed, however, among those who ate cooked vegetables.<br /><br />The researchers in the current study noted that other forms of processing besides cooking might also lead to the degradation of sulforaphane or its chemical precursors.<br /><br />"The sulforaphane content of cooked broccoli was lower than the glucoraphanin content of raw broccoli, 9.92 and 61.4 micromoles, respectively," the researchers noted. "It seems that the conversion from glucosinolate to isothiocyanate was incomplete or that another reaction occurred."<br /><br />Glucoraphanin (a glucosinolate) is the chemical precursor to sulforaphane (an isothiocyanate).<br /><br />"In future research," they said, "care should be taken that glucoraphanin is not hydrolyzed into other metabolites when broccoli is crushed."</strong>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-38957012678180909362009-03-19T12:00:00.005-04:002009-03-19T12:00:16.497-04:00Big Pharma Funded Activist Groups Behind the EPA Petition to Regulate Silverby Tony Isaacs
<br />
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Recently it was revealed that a handful of the activist agencies behind the petition to the EPA to regulate nano-silver as a pesticide have received funding from pharmaceutical giant Merck, which annually has hundreds of billions of dollars in profits from patented antibiotics which many believe are less effective, less safe and far more expensive than colloidal nano-silver products. Now, further investigation has discovered that the initial revelations may just be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Merck and other pharmaceutical companies' funding of the groups who support the EPA petition.</span>
<br /></strong><a title="blocked::http://www.tidescenter.org/" href="http://www.tidescenter.org/"></a>
<br /><strong>The actual source of the funding that was first revealed in emails and colloidal silver blogsites was the John Merck Fund which was set up in 1970 by Serena Merck, the widow of Merck Pharmaceuticals CEO George W. Merck, in honor of their short-lived son John. The recipients of funding who are signees on the petition to the EPA were identified as:
<br />
<br /></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong>
<br /><strong><em>Funding To Activist Groups</em>-----------------<em>Total Donated</em>---<em>Time Frame</em>
<br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Center for Food Safety $1,305,000.00 1999 – 2005
<br />Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy $490,000.00 1992 – 2003
<br />International Center for Technology Assessment $247,500.00 1999 – 1999
<br />Consumers Union of the United States $90,000.00 2000 – 2001
<br />Greenpeace $80,000.00 2000 – 2002
<br />Friends of the Earth $45,000.00 1992 – 2000
<br /></span></strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>The Center for Food Safety (CFS) which along with its sister organization the International Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA), initiated the EPA petition and enlisted the other groups which signed off on the petition, received the second largest amount of funding of any group from the John Merck Fund - second only to the huge total of the Tides Center/Tides Foundation, whose total funding of almost $2.7 Million dwarfs the combined total of $1.75 Million given to the CFS and the ICTA and CFS.</strong>
<br />
<br /><strong>Tides Foundation & Tides Center $2,693,000.00 1989 – 2005</strong>
<br />
<br /><a title="blocked::http://www.activistcash.com/foundation.cfm?did=" href="http://www.activistcash.com/foundation.cfm?did=138"><strong></a></strong><strong><a href="http://www.activistcash.com/foundation.cfm?did=138">http://www.activistcash.com/foundation.cfm?did=138</strong></a><strong></strong></a>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>As it turns out, the top funding recipient Tides Foundation and Tides Center are also actively involved in the petition to regulate silver, as well as the source of funding and support to several of the other groups who signed the EPA petition. When one goes to the Tides Center website, their position is apparent to one and all with the posting of a press release urging support of the EPA petition:</strong>
<br />
<br /><a title="blocked::http://www.tidescenter.org/news-resources/news-releases/single-press-release/article/epa-petitioned-to-stop-sale-of-260-products-containing-nanosilver/index.html" href="http://www.tidescenter.org/news-resources/news-releases/single-press-release/article/epa-petitioned-to-stop-sale-of-260-products-containing-nanosilver/index.html"><strong>http://www.tidescenter.org/news-resources/news-releases/single-press-release/article/epa-petitioned-to-stop-sale-of-260-products-containing-nanosilver/index.html</strong></a>
<br />
<br /><strong>Information on Tides Center's website and other web searches found the following Tides Center/Tides Foundation connections to groups not listed as Merck funding recipients:</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>* Center for Environmental Health (a project of the Tides Center)</strong>
<br /><strong>* Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (previous funding and connections with the Tides Foundation)</strong>
<br /><strong>* Clean Production Action (a Tides Center project)</strong>
<br /><strong>* Food and Water Watch (receives donations from the Tides Foundation)</strong>
<br /><strong>* The Loka Institute (has no current offices but was previously provided office space and a mailbox in Washington. DC by the International Center for Technology Assessment in their offices)</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>In addition, a $200,000 grant for 2006-2007 from a second Merck Foundation, the Merck Family Fund to another petitioner, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, was discovered.</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>A quick internet search reveals that Merck is not the only pharmaceutical company which provides funding to the Tides Foundation and Tides Center, as this listing of the top funding recipient from the Pfizer Foundation demonstrates:</strong>
<br />
<br /><strong>Funding To Activist Groups----------Total Donated------Time Frame
<br /></strong><a title="blocked::http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/225" href="http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/225"><strong>Tides Foundation & Tides Center</strong></a><strong> $300,000.00 2003 – 2004
<br />
<br /></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>The Tides Foundation is described by Activistcash.com as quickly becoming "the 800 pound gorilla for activist funding." As reported on ActivistCash:</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">The Tides foundation was established in 1976 by California activist Drummond Pike, Tides does two things better than any other foundation or charity in the U.S. today: it routinely obscures the sources of its tax-exempt millions, and makes it difficult (if not impossible) to discern how the funds are actually being used.</span></strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>In practice, “Tides” behaves less like a philanthropy than a money-laundering enterprise (apologies to Procter & Gamble), taking money from other foundations and spending it as the donor requires. Called donor-advised giving, this pass-through funding vehicle provides public-relations insulation for the money’s original donors. By using Tides to funnel its capital, a large public charity can indirectly fund a project with which it would prefer not to be directly identified in public. Drummond Pike has reinforced this view, telling The Chronicle of Philanthropy: “Anonymity is very important to most of the people we work with.”</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>Although determining the scope of funding for the Tides group as well as the individual activist groups would be difficult due to the efforts of many of them to insure anonymity, a quick web search turned up the following information for the Pfizer Foundation:</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">One can only wonder what other pharmaceutical funding is linked to these groups and shudder to think of how many activist groups have been corrupted by funding from Big Pharma and other companies with agendas that are anything but in the public interest.</span></strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>It is easy to see how such subterfuge can corrupt decision making, the same as can paid lobbyists and political funding. Obviously it would be in the distinct public interest to require full disclosure of funding sources for every organization which petitions a government agency or legislative body to see where there might be funding sources who would stand to benefit as a result of the desired action or legislation.</strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Similarly, it would also be in the public interest to require full details of all the activities and efforts of lobbyists, including expenses and the details of each meeting held by lobbyists with government officials. While we are at it, we would also be a better informed and better served citizenry if every elected officials vote on any measure included donations and links to any companies or other entities affected by such legislation.</span></strong>
<br /><strong></strong>
<br /><strong>Granted, such reforms are a tall order, but until we see such altruistic change all the talk about true transparency in government is merely lip service - and the words from our own lips will continue to have little chance of reaching those whose ears are captured by the special interests who have bought off and otherwise rigged the process in their favor.</strong>
<br />
<br />
<br />See Also:
<br />
<br />"<a title="blocked::http://www.naturalnews.com/025366.html" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/025366.html">Action Alert: Stop EPA from Eliminating Access to Colloidal Silver</a>"
<br />
<br />
<br />Notes:
<br />
<br />The complete list of groups who signed the petition to the EPA is: The International Center for Technology Assessment, the Center for Food Safety (the sister organization of the CTA), Beyond Pesticides, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, ETC Group, Center for Environmental Health, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition , Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Clean Production Action, Food and Water Watch, the Loka Institute, the Center for Study of Responsive Law, and Consumers Union.
<br />
<br />
<br />Sources included:
<br />
<br /><a title="blocked::http://www.silvermedicine.org/nano-silver.html" href="http://www.silvermedicine.org/nano-silver.html">http://www.silvermedicine.org/nano-silver.html</a>
<br />
<br /><a title="blocked::http://www.activistcash.com/" href="http://www.activistcash.com/">http://www.activistcash.com/</a>
<br />
<br /><a title="blocked::http://www.tidescenter.org/" href="http://www.tidescenter.org/">http://www.tidescenter.org/</a>
<br />Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-58421816178038151132009-03-19T07:00:00.001-04:002009-03-19T07:00:22.565-04:00Vaccines as Biological Weapons? Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor<br /><br /><strong>There's a popular medical thriller novel in which a global pandemic is intentionally set off by an evil plot designed to reduce the human population. In the book, a nefarious drug company inserts live avian flu viruses into vaccine materials that are distributed to countries around the world to be injected into patients as "flu shots." Those patients then become carriers for these highly-virulent strains of avian flu which go on to infect the world population and cause widespread death.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>There's only one problem with this story: It's not fiction. Or, at least, the part about live </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/avian_flu.html"><strong>avian flu</strong></a><strong> viruses being inserted into vaccine materials isn't fiction. It's happening right now.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Deerfield, Illinois-based pharmaceutical company Baxter International Inc. has just been caught shipping live avian flu </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/viruses.html"><strong>viruses</strong></a><strong> mixed with vaccine material to medical distributors in 18 countries. The "mistake" (if you can call it that, see below...) was discovered by the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. The World Health Organization was alerted and panic spread throughout the vaccine community as </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html"><strong>health</strong></a><strong> experts asked the obvious question: How could this have happened?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As published on LifeGen.de (</strong><a href="http://www.lifegen.de/newsip/shownews.php4?getnews=2009-02-26-5323&pc=s01" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.lifegen.de/newsip/showne...</strong></a><strong>), serious questions like this are being raised:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><em><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>"Baxter International Inc. in Austria 'unintentionally contaminated samples with the </strong></span></em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/bird_flu_virus.html"><em><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>bird flu virus</strong></span></em></a><em><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong> that were used in laboratories in 3 neighbouring countries, raising concern about the potential spread of the deadly disease'. Austria, Germany, Slovenia and the Czech Republic - these are the countries in which labs were hit with dangerous viruses. Not by bioterrorist commandos, but by Baxter. In other words: One of the major global pharmaceutical players seems to have lost control over a virus which is considered by many virologists to be one of the components leading some day to a new </strong></span></em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/pandemic.html"><em><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>pandemic</strong></span></em></a><em><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>."</strong></span></em><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Or, put another way, Baxter is acting a whole lot like a biological terrorism organization these days, sending deadly viral samples around the world. If you mail an envelope full of anthrax to your Senator, you get arrested as a </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/terrorist.html"><strong>terrorist</strong></a><strong>. So why is Baxter -- which mailed samples of a far more deadly viral strain to labs around the world -- getting away with saying, essentially, "Oops"?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But there's a bigger question in all this: How could this company have accidentally mixed LIVE avian flu viruses (both H5N1 and H3N2, the human form) in this vaccine material?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;color:#ff0000;">Was the viral contamination intentional?</span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The shocking answer is that this couldn't have been an accident. Why? Because Baxter International adheres to something called BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) - a set of laboratory safety protocols that prevent the cross-contamination of materials.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As explained on </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Wikipedia.html"><strong>Wikipedia</strong></a><strong> (</strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosaf" target="_blank"><strong>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosaf...</strong></a><strong>):</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>"Laboratory personnel have specific training in handling pathogenic and potentially lethal agents, and are supervised by competent scientists who are experienced in working with these agents. This is considered a neutral or warm zone. All procedures involving the manipulation of infectious materials are conducted within biological safety cabinets or other physical containment devices, or by personnel wearing appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment. The laboratory has special engineering and design features."</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Under the BSL3 code of conduct, it is impossible for live avian flu viruses to contaminate production vaccine materials that are shipped out to vendors around the world.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>This leaves only two possibilities that explain these events:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Possibility #1: Baxter isn't following BSL3 safety guidelines or is so sloppy in following them that it can make monumental mistakes that threaten the safety of the entire human race. And if that's the case, then why are we injecting our children with </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/vaccines.html"><strong>vaccines</strong></a><strong> made from Baxter's materials?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Possibility #2: A rogue employee (or an evil plot from the top management) is present at Baxter, whereby live avian flu viruses were intentionally placed into the vaccine materials in the hope that such materials might be injected into humans and set off a global </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/bird_flu_pandemic.html"><strong>bird flu pandemic</strong></a><strong>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>It just so happens that a global bird </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/flu_pandemic.html"><strong>flu pandemic</strong></a><strong> would sell a LOT of bird </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/flu_vaccines.html"><strong>flu vaccines</strong></a><strong>. Although some naive people have a hard time believing that corporations would endanger </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/human_beings.html"><strong>human beings</strong></a><strong> to make money, this is precisely the way </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/corporations.html"><strong>corporations</strong></a><strong> now behave in America's ethically-challenged free-market environment. (Remember Enron? Exxon? Merck? DuPont? Monsanto? Need I go on?)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Make no mistake: Spreading </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/bird_flu.html"><strong>bird flu</strong></a><strong> is a clever way to create demand for bird flu vaccines, and we've all seen very clearly how </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/drug_companies.html"><strong>drug companies</strong></a><strong> first market the problem and then "leap to the rescue" by selling the solution. (Disease mongering of ADHD, bipolar disorder, etc.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:180%;">Why it all suddenly makes sense</span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Until today, I would not have personally believed such a story. I personally thought talk of bird flu vaccines being "weaponized" was just alarmist hype. But now, in light of the fact that LIVE bird flu viruses are being openly found in vaccine materials that are distributed around the world, I must admit the evidence is increasingly compelling that something extremely dangerous is afoot.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Baxter, through either its mistakes or its evil intentions, just put the safety of the entire human race at risk. Given all the laboratory protocols put in place to prevent this kind of thing, it is difficult to believe this was just a mistake.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>There is some speculation, in fact, that the 1918 </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/influenza_pandemic.html"><strong>influenza pandemic</strong></a><strong>, which killed up to 50 million people worldwide (</strong><a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-USUS294US304&q=1918%20influenza&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi" target="_blank"><strong>http://images.google.com/images?hl=...</strong></a><strong>), was intentionally started by injecting servicemen with "experimental" flu vaccines that actually contained live, "weaponized" flu material just like the material being distributed by Baxter today.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Examine the historical record. You'll find that the 1918 flu originated with servicemen. Even more interestingly, it began in multiple cities, simultaneously! There is no single point of origin with the 1918 flu. It appears to have "spontaneously" sprung up across multiple cities all at once, including a </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/military.html"><strong>military</strong></a><strong> base in Kansas. (Kansas? Yep. So how did it get to Kansas in an era when air traffic was virtually non-existent? Vaccines, of course!)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>All those cities and servicemen have one thing in common: Flu shot vaccinations given to them by the military.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>If you put the pieces together on this, it's not too difficult to suspect that </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/influenza.html"><strong>influenza</strong></a><strong> could potentially be used as a tool of control by governments or drug companies to catalyze outrageous profit-taking or power grabbing agendas. A desperate, infected population will gladly give up anything or pay anything for the promise of being cured.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:180%;">Or was it just an innocent mistake? Oops!</span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But for the skeptics who dismiss any such talk of conspiracy theories, let's examine the other possibility: That a global avian flu pandemic was nearly unleashed unintentionally due to the outrageous incompetence of the companies handling these viral strains.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As we just saw, this is a very real possibility. Had this live bird </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/flu_virus.html"><strong>flu virus</strong></a><strong> not been detected, it could have very easily found its way into vaccines that were injected into human beings. And this, in turn, could have unleashed a global avian flu pandemic.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>If the drug companies making and handling these materials are so careless, then it seems like it's only a matter of time before something slips through the safety precautions again and gets unleashed into the wild. And that leads to essentially the same scenario: A </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/global_pandemic.html"><strong>global pandemic</strong></a><strong>, widespread death, health care failures and a desperate population begging for vaccines.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So either way -- whether it's intentional or not -- you essentially get the same result.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Why a global pandemic is only a matter of time</em></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I am on the record stating that a global pandemic is only a matter of time. The living conditions under which humans have placed themselves (crowded cities, suppressed immune systems, etc.) are ideal for the spread of infectious </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/disease.html"><strong>disease</strong></a><strong>. But I never dreamed drug companies could actually be accelerating the pandemic timeline by contaminating vaccine materials with live avian flu viruses known to be highly infectious to humans. This, it seems, is a whole new cause for concern.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>You can believe what you will. Maybe you agree with the nefarious plot theory and you agree that corporations are capable of great evils in their quest for profits. Or perhaps you can't accept that, so you go with the "accidental contamination" theory, in which your beliefs describe a very dangerous world where biohazard safety protocols are insufficient to protect us from all the crazy viral strains being toyed with at drug companies and government labs all across the world.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In either case, the world is not a very safe place when deadly viral strains are placed in the hands of the inept.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>We are like children playing God with Mother Nature, rolling the dice in a global game of Viral Roulette where the odds are not in our favor. With companies like Baxter engaged in behaviors that are just begging to see the human race devastated by a global pandemic wipeout, it might be a good time to question the sanity of using viral strains in vaccines in the first place.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Vaccine-pushing scientists are so proud of their vaccines. They think they've conquered Mother Nature. Imagine their surprise when one day they learn they have actually killed 100 million human beings by unleashing a global pandemic.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>We came close to it this week. A global pandemic may have just been averted by the thinnest of margins. Yet people go on with their lives, oblivious to what nearly happened.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>What's inescapable at this point is the fact that the threat of a pandemic that looms for all of human civilization, and that drug companies may, themselves, be the source of that threat.</strong><br /><br /><br />Important Resources<br /><br />Read my book How to Beat the Bird Flu here: <a href="http://www.truthpublishing.com/bird..." target="_blank">http://www.truthpublishing.com/bird...</a><br /><br />See a remarkable collection of quotes and accounts from authors writing about the 1918 influenza pandemic here: <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/025759.html" target="_blank">www.NaturalNews.com/025759.html</a><br /><br /><br />Stories about Baxter International, Inc. and its avian influenza "oops" moment:<br /><br />The Canadian Press: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ca..." target="_blank">http://www.google.com/hostednews/ca...</a><br /><br />Bloomberg.com: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?..." target="_blank">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?...</a><br /><br />LifeGen.de: <a href="http://www.lifegen.de/newsip/shownews.php4?getnews=2009-02-26-5323&pc=s01" target="_blank">http://www.lifegen.de/newsip/showne...</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-44126999906094592882009-03-19T00:00:00.001-04:002009-03-19T00:00:14.240-04:00A Listing of the Twenty-One Fabricated Studies by Dr. Scott Reuben<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor<br /><br /><strong>The health community is up in arms over the discovery that a highly-respected and influential clinical researcher, Dr. Scott Reuben, fabricated the data used in over twenty pharmaceutical studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals. Read the full NaturalNews report on this topic here: </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/025833.html" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.naturalnews.com/025833.html</strong></a><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>These studies promoted the safety and "benefits" of drugs like Bextra (Pfizer), Vioxx (Merck), Lyrica, Celebrex and Effexor. The lead researcher on these studies, Dr. Scott Reuben, was being paid by </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Pfizer.html"><strong>Pfizer</strong></a><strong> and Merck, so there's a verified financial connection between this clinical researcher and at least two of the </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/drug_companies.html"><strong>drug companies</strong></a><strong> that benefitted from his fabricated findings. (</strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/h" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/h...</strong></a><strong>)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Note carefully the names of the </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/medical_journals.html"><strong>medical journals</strong></a><strong> that published Dr. Reuben's fabricated data (see below). These so-called "science journals" claim to be peer-reviewed, which means these studies were approved by multiple scientists who agreed with the findings.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>What this scandal reveals is that even peer-reviewed medical journals cannot be trusted to publish truthful, accurate information about pharmaceuticals. In fact, they are just as much a part of the Big Pharma / FDA conspiracy as the pill-pushing researchers who fabricate these studies, in my opinion.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The only honest medical science journal I've found is PLoS Medicine (</strong><a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/" target="_blank"><strong>http://medicine.plosjournals.org</strong></a><strong>). Everything else I've seen is just tabloid medicalized fiction sandwiched in between pages of false </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/advertising.html"><strong>advertising</strong></a><strong>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And conventional </strong><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/doctors.html"><strong>doctors</strong></a><strong>, for all their self-proclaimed intelligence and scientific skepticism, were universally hoodwinked by this faked data! Apparently the best way to convince doctors that a drug is safe and effective is to just invent whatever story you want and submit it to a medical journal, which then gladly publishes it.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>If you're looking for a career as a fiction writer, the heck with authoring books sold in the "fiction" section of the local bookstore... just write for medical journals and drug companies! Their pay is better and the fiction is even more outrageous!</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Speaking of fiction and false advertising, here's a list of studies authored or co-authored by Dr. Scott Reuben who admittedly fabricated at least twenty-one of these studies. Dr. Reuben was recently a faculty member at Tufts Medical School and co-founder of the Orthopedic Anesthesia, Pain and Rehabilitation Society, by the way. You can read more about his fraud in Scientific American (</strong><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id...</strong></a><strong>).</strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/z025852.html">Click here for the medical studies authored/fabricated by Dr. Scott Reuben</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-43634817921043352782009-03-18T21:00:00.000-04:002009-03-18T21:00:15.339-04:00Dispel the Myths: The True Function of Cholesterol in the Body<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Elizabeth Walling, citizen journalist<br /><br /><strong>If you've been religiously counting cholesterol grams in an attempt to eliminate it from your diet, you may be startled to hear the main function of cholesterol in the body is not to clog your arteries. The media has propagated cholesterol as a vile substance akin to trans fat, but in reality, it's not so simple. Cholesterol is not all bad - in fact, it has important functions in a variety of vital processes in your body.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>First it should be noted that cholesterol is not a type of fat; it is a high-molecular-weight alcohol made in the liver and other cells in the body. It is not water-soluble and cannot actually be transported freely in the blood. Instead, it is carried in lipoprotein throughout the body so it performs essential duties.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Here are just some of the many tasks cholesterol accomplishes in your body each day:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>- Cholesterol is a crucial building material in the body. It helps maintain the structure of cells and vessels, improving overall health and function in the body.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>- Cholesterol is a precursor to important sex hormones like testosterone, estrogen, androgen and progesterone. It is also a precursor to corticosteroids, hormones whose primary function is to protect the body against stress and disease. This includes the crucial hormones, cortisol and DHEA.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>- Used as an insulator around nerves, cholesterol promotes healthy nervous system function and helps to prevent diseases associated with the nervous system. It is absolutely essential for brain function.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>- Since bile salts are made from cholesterol, adequate cholesterol is needed for proper digestion. In addition, cholesterol aids the digestive system by strengthening the intestinal walls.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>- Cholesterol is a precursor to vitamin D, an important nutrient which supports a healthy immune and nervous system, reproduction, insulin production and the metabolism of minerals. Recently the suggested daily allowance for vitamin D has been significantly raised in light of how important it is for good health.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>- Serotonin receptors in the brain require cholesterol in order to function properly. Serotonin is an important neurotransmitter that promotes a natural feeling of well-being. Low levels of serotonin are linked to depression, violence and suicide.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Understanding this information can help to clear up the fog surrounding the truth about cholesterol's function in the body. Cholesterol itself is not a substance that should be feared as one would fear the bubonic plague. It is a naturally occurring alcohol, manufactured by the body for very specific and necessary reasons. Without it, our quality of life would be severely reduced and our health would ultimately fail.</strong><br /><br /><br />Sources:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/Articl..." target="_blank">http://www.spiked-online.com/Articl...</a><br /><br />Fallon, Sally and Enig, Mary. (1999) Nourishing Traditions: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats.<br /><br />Schwarzbein, Diana. (1999) The Schwarzbein Principle: The Truth About Losing Weight, Being Healthy and Feeling Younger.Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1980414515744763605.post-78975457590214817942009-03-18T19:00:00.000-04:002009-03-18T19:00:11.725-04:00The Most Destructive Industrial Venture on Earth: The Canadian Oil Sands Pose Great Danger<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html">NaturalNews.com</a><br /><br />by Dave Gabriele, citizen journalist<br /><br /><strong>Common belief is that the Middle East is America's largest supplier of oil. In truth, Canada supplies more oil to the US than any other country, providing 19% of US foreign oil. About half of that oil comes from the single largest industrial project on Earth--the Canadian Oil Sands in Alberta, Canada. The Oil Sands, comprised of the Athabasca, Peace River and Cold Lake sites, contains approximately 170 billion barrels of oil in proven reserves. This makes Canada the world's second largest source of oil, after Saudi Arabia.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As of 2006, the Oil Sands were producing over 1.1 million barrels of oil per day, or about 42% of Canada's total crude output. As the industry steadily grows, it is anticipated that production will reach 3 million barrels per day by 2020 and possibly even 5 million barrels per day by 2030.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>This deposit of oil represents a great source of wealth for Canada, and especially for the United States, which prefers a stable source closer to home. However, this massive project, which encompasses operations from 49 companies, is literally the largest and most environmentally destructive endeavor of all time.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>What are Oil Sands?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Geologists speculate that the oil sands formed millions of years ago from the remains of tiny creatures buried in the seabed of an ancient ocean that covered Alberta. Warm temperatures, combined with the slow accumulation of thick layers of silt, sand and pressure, continuously heated these remains and gradually converted them into the oil sands. The sands consist of a mixture of silica sand, minerals, clay, water and bitumen. Bitumen, a tar-like substance, is a super-heavy form of petroleum.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Environmental Concerns</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The enormous process of extracting oil from the oil sands begins with cutting down large areas of boreal forest. So far, the industry has flattened about 389 square kilometers or 150 square miles. Concerns over rapid deforestation have environmentalists troubled.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Because bitumen is too thick and heavy to be pumped like conventional oil, it must be dug out of the ground in what closely resembles an open-pit mining operation. In order to get just one barrel of bitumen, workers need to first scoop about two tons of earth to get to the sand, and then about two tons of the sand itself. To make this process as efficient as possible, the industry uses $15 million 495HF Bucyrus electric shovels that stand five-storeys high to dig out sand and drop 400-ton loads onto 1.5-storey 797B Caterpillar dump trucks. Every day, about one million tons of the sand is dug and transported to be washed with about 200,000 tons of water. The water is then heated in order to extract the bitumen from the sand. This method costs roughly 10 times more than it costs the Saudis to pump their light oil.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But this process is only an option for the shallow bitumen that is closest to the surface. An estimated 80% of the reserves are too deep to be dug so instead the bitumen is steamed straight from the ground using enormously intricate systems of pipes and pumps. This is called "in situ thermal recovery" and it uses about twice the energy of the digging method.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Only when the bitumen has been extracted from the sand can usable oil be upgraded from the bitumen. The raw bitumen is sent to upgrader plants which process the black tar under high heat and pressure. The entire process uses an incredibly large amount of energy which is mostly supplied by natural gas. Critics of the industry note that the cleanest of the fossil fuels is being depleted to produce one of the dirtiest.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The Oil Sands operation releases at least three times the CO2 emissions as regular oil production and is the fastest growing contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in Canada.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But deforestation, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions aren't the only problems. It takes an average of three barrels of fresh water from the Athabasca River to produce just one barrel of oil. The Oil Sands uses more water per year than the entire city of Calgary, the largest city in Alberta and the fifth largest in Canada. In return, one barrel of oil produces about two barrels of toxic water. The waste is pumped into dozens of holding basins known as "tailings ponds." Although they are known as ponds, some of these massive man-made lakes are dozens of kilometers across. They are clearly visible on Google Earth. (Satellite image: </strong><a href="http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=k" target="_blank"><strong>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=k...</strong></a><strong>)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In April 2008, the problems of the toxic tailings ponds entered Canadian consciousness when the media disseminated a story in which 500 ducks lost their lives by mistaking a tailings pond for a natural lake. Although the Alberta government denies it, environmental groups maintain that the tailings ponds leak contaminated water into local soil and water ways causing severe ecological harm.</strong><br /><br />For further reading:<br /><a href="http://www.environmentaldefence.ca/..." target="_blank">http://www.environmentaldefence.ca/...</a><br /><a href="http://www.ualberta.ca/ERSC/water.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ualberta.ca/ERSC/water.pdf</a><br /><a href="http://pubs.pembina.org/reports/LastDrop_Mar1606c.pdf" target="_blank">http://pubs.pembina.org/reports/Las...</a>Ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11408107561017310537noreply@blogger.com0